Re: [Sframe] SFrame agenda for 110

Alexandre GOUAILLARD <> Thu, 25 February 2021 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B933A14C4 for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:36:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o2ZxVFL4nZl7 for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:36:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 214D63A0C94 for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:36:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id o10so3233306pgg.4 for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:36:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LUJt+fgc6dN63xmlmVpvEWRchFmRIPjfTFgVy1D08NU=; b=fU+Xy4lwIiEK8GQz66rKxjhmGyxpF5X6foSv9+nrJ+SU5MM8yh09e18JgSlHED2Hxx XppJUgIj1sh4V5ELwBc70ZhRCn5mnSWzRTQRnSIhRUQBFAvwjpqCdHJ3w4mp3owCIgkG GQQMch7igi/IdaJ2iecg6WSOjh7dClTSE1PEyyaxp+IVlt7u5yF8zy1KktoiKMYz1bEr C6ybHHb1cr5ACm25rVUgrSwqTWntJQ+j9j9Rpgn+AIV9zDFJjSefb7wO4i6z8UnToImV MyMysl9IxEHE4HhzZIe1+FD7PjNJceQIZFZ4h5AWWq9Cd2xjLr4xFDukKR857Wn5tOy0 79PA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LUJt+fgc6dN63xmlmVpvEWRchFmRIPjfTFgVy1D08NU=; b=PA9ADEnpiramgCy+05tBB1H7kogCinkKdJNc9o0OIrAK1i/08gzHTQMqFoMSmiIPlH zEkqluEWh5RmiG0HR+0PnVi3Kb8Qv+zZ+5mDtDMdEbsiEbXFpIR5oeTqLq7JCo3hFBox Sv7a5Le6a8OroO9qEsL6wWW8I9stbzgCDMir5dFD7wFBK44te6C9/gH7ytx0NaVBRxPY oXTbcRZ2CXdD6Yqd6yQYENjyBS2AOXRzRRxpQgby63zlGVeoj2FUwiA108pm07yZ0YSu LVfexJ2sihEX3inFDyV+WJZiYoKiMyqxas4sdusJ+OPPT7hzE7/Wpy2kjTzLVcKO837S tjMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533bui+CdICvjwOOu32PqKgrIGvJ8p2Mr/bJXgbMjly+SLvj7w0u oEfLoiyoiWhcJHCXXuq3e0DBDBMeLTbNSTwoxn+FJw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztmqxVULC4mE5tmvyoLxDQ/bw/qry+hyHaqqeR/RvZC4X4KZUruXNhHZDEBI9Xb9p0k8/2LZCVxID19pav0Yg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2ac:b029:1e9:3cb7:324a with SMTP id q12-20020a056a0002acb02901e93cb7324amr2085268pfs.36.1614238571400; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:36:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:36:00 +0800
Message-ID: <>
To: Martin Thomson <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a1a56705bc2434ea"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Sframe] SFrame agenda for 110
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 07:36:13 -0000

> The issue that seems most pressing is how the framework interacts with
> packetization and the way in which we decide what is and isn't protected.
> It seems like we have made some progress in that area, but at the last
> meeting some people were not sufficiently happy with the current state of
> the documentation.

- A new draft has been submitted to AVTcore on the matter.I believe Sergio
could present it.

- I believe RichardB@Cisco has also made progress about MLS-Sfrane

- I did not have time to finish a full informal I-D by the 2/22 deadline,
but I have slides and drawings about the big picture, and I would be happy
to present them as a base for discussion.