Re: [Sframe] Concluding SFRAME

To paraphrase what Sergio and Youenn are saying, I think that if we close
this group now, it's just going to be back in a few weeks / months.  If a
few months of quiescence would make you happy, and you're willing to push
the buttons to re-start it at the appropriate time, then sure.  But maybe
let's give it a reprieve until IETF 115?

--RLB

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 11:37 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 11:11 AM Youenn Fablet <youenn@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 to what Sergio said.
>>
>> Also, there has been some progress on GitHub, admittedly very slow, to
>> be able to finalise the first WG draft.
>> The latest commit was made 5 days ago.
>> I would expect a first WG draft to happen before the end of this summer.
>>
>
> Youenn,
>
> The change made five days ago appears to be a merge of a bunch of
> automated and other miscellaneous metadata changes, not draft development.
> The last change to the actual draft work I can see was in March, matching
> the last time there was any non-automatic list traffic.
>
> What I don't see much evidence of is that there's likely to be sustained
> working group energy should this draft appear by the end of the summer.
> The working group was chartered in November of 2020 but hasn't adopted
> anything yet.  I believe the chairs are feeling deflated, and I sympathize.
>
> Do you believe we're going to see an active working group here in the near
> future?
>
> -MSK
> --
> Sframe mailing list
> Sframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe
>