Re: [Sframe] Erik Kline's No Objection on charter-ietf-sframe-00-00: (with COMMENT)

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Thu, 10 September 2020 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD393A0A36 for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8e7UqoyH0Kin for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 849903A0A2D for <sframe@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id p65so4845425qtd.2 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KY2FWG7kdqga+OMvDhwCIEoStPaL7sOxC7JBQr5VHOg=; b=tq1B9n8ItcpjoxDYqbtnGqgzny9Yk70ojMjxwIGVmkqnOgw0XVoDzxkF/DRTXqAJGg NsDcQzeK9hYs0c4Npgo/r4+za76QRFkBCq+ezz+YfCq2aHWUNit7kqrDcNIOsYZD+9zo KMcqYktmK+MFOy3C8rNUNjtE1NtmrEoDO9EcbiSNtCgLgeYkccLHGTI1fTxnCWokexD9 gwbzQkL4nFLNwqchQ0J3mv/e14RO5QogbhKVgw/oOnNDm/RBmwoUjt3/NToHr5pysdB7 G/78dbpeW+bN+4P/XyKzwgPMPOJ7v+NtRLpTFTg9vmLc8hIzl7xouM/5TVOE/ZHTouJE CtBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KY2FWG7kdqga+OMvDhwCIEoStPaL7sOxC7JBQr5VHOg=; b=JN+gxI1hB5XOMtjq+pxG+D+J+UXQDKFMd2HNkGKU4z9sLbS8E8lohOkN9g8/MuVGF+ mJmbyh2OcV6W20Slc5AtZGon7XQwfrmj/pDd5OIpWpzM7IKzd0FwM/Gxck2Jpl+1Ncr5 /rAziaFOTuTl+xbshGw6a1AUHok0Gn4kOpfCD+/vQ5gewjfQPV9B8fFjxzERu5tow/Hd kRFqI2DXNhCrNQYyIUU9m9JKGOTQVG9wtKeOdfIHRsq/PE55lVwWIpLREiKV3K7eeIK5 2xnNhhWjo1pt/uqh0VVrRoOTqufid1oUPzrqqTfzWCnd6VVPjCMS8QRFewICLeCGShY2 Fu7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531G0btfz0Z9UxtQFQb75IpwzuECXzzn4i4HovhiP6Cgsco+0S0f R1GCpXWq0cxCPBzEcFVHPDejlwh54tAWko/T5424Vg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLjADAPdyslyBJ5d+uwypb4QgmytjBZu1vaILhX2ATYAjfHVyIH41zvPgvpx/eleH3Ttl4AFn56VrK8gHFDc4=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1b92:: with SMTP id z18mr781016qtj.265.1599745294521; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159968627781.11463.12811961039308421789@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159968627781.11463.12811961039308421789@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:41:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgTpO4yDyMWB3QUBTYumXBxAh-Lw2Fq_W4y-hdokybeeUw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sframe-chairs@ietf.org, DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>, sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000002eb2705aef5ba3a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/vGu3kBJzfg2hn7UjlDAAuPTAeDo>
Subject: Re: [Sframe] Erik Kline's No Objection on charter-ietf-sframe-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:41:37 -0000

Hi Erik: To you question about QUIC -- No impact.  QUIC would provide the
outer, "hop by hop" layer of protection, as SRTP would today.  SFrame would
still be needed for the E2E layer.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:18 PM Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
wrote:

> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-sframe-00-00: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-sframe/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [[ comments/questions ]]
>
> * Agree with "Information to form a unique nonce within the scope of the
> key"
>   seeming a bit underdefined at the moment.
>
> * If conferencing migrates to carriage over QUIC, would that have any
>   impact on/overlap with this work?
>
>
>
> --
> Sframe mailing list
> Sframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe
>