Re: [Sframe] Dispatch of SFrame for End-To-End Encrypted Conference Calls
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Mon, 15 June 2020 19:30 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7E03A091C for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jWPQLdVTWu2o for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 027983A08FC for <sframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id w1so16911522qkw.5 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LeNI+1yuLit3/ZWjjJEGC312MJLgqZEh0xA2ccRhqdU=; b=k9ghVVZh7l+bYKjMniVq9UQTl/yQ33JPZj9uOCC6avlnyb/agd91eMHTBDez9hlNOs zv0GxiQt0Vd/KnCc7rpdkHYVRjjBaohvdZkuvz+NZnvuAjKA0uFDygYamlqt9kxHHBxT pTqVLyKPONOcA8NDJeoSLDmcwhPXO5T6IA+wnGxnECFytsyaWHE/Wbp4s985NlpI21bn ZerAPDNYdaMFg2MldmwZJG2Kp3QA7g8wmgJGeJqVBlasSRM7eDyv7mm8PTyh9ZVLxjYN Yj9RQVVXBa2wWqY/UHkwLyGR0APrMuRN/Bs3aBlEuYMWbVtTQXfz4kkjaLTQE2Gx845x O+HQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LeNI+1yuLit3/ZWjjJEGC312MJLgqZEh0xA2ccRhqdU=; b=iOt+gU9eGs/jilMC0x63KqMqSEli8QsawbmnTu+K6ErDCOTtMXlts6Rg9+2NioIlrR MNyrJdvCTU5VEE9Wpk9QXbtPy0pSGjt3a8UCpeScADZOuQOpEgunXw4CtUCmqc/WBaZi pX50pW9ovEZakUlGLef7WsxyrfZv4bpWX8U7X/vnlyF4mhVIeE8bU5U9wLX8qnrHJjhw RZvC5IQxVuVOYXCJdq6+KdJImDnLqnpQ4Z/36mvhSxF3qJlhzcV2iOgSxNqlnsOuB/Yg swYWWCwolhIH7o9scO1Fs+9xSPrQJwGpPv77XLn1LqswJ4Geoog4fZDkdFIy2pOEm6CL djyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ymLXhH8pnkmWhQnKb+66HfveTKDVZXvrO4D2lGSIs+msrhkKV Cxtr14/XV6wpu4WnR6ASj+8I4/Gi9YdI6FJpHnT9Aw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJJGQnMuwUdtw6GoJjHj04m1NXopWdO2wERsaMjPU/S8+dPvk0tJ0FegD7Ya18k2Qk6VdYtKi/agjHOGNkGpE=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:5842:: with SMTP id m63mr17034695qkb.347.1592249427887; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHo7dC8oF4nOkVXf2=igaGdtRYTGk0a=rjkBZ7goYjZP+m25ew@mail.gmail.com> <E8A5F574-7D1B-4BE7-873E-9AFF84C0B3A8@nostrum.com> <CAHo7dC_O13kQdwMmkKcaQ1ctxVKSvv3EqdRfikBhohDaiaujsg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNri5J5p74Niosc4JKPhMOUTeq5hqK2ZjPD-RxQ0w75M6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNrx4cMn20XMrv9zO1jKi8FtEkDLEE7nvc15DKVodJ6NxA@mail.gmail.com> <4425D473-7A6A-4AF5-BA53-635255D6EC55@nostrum.com> <CAHo7dC8u1dwAmiTM2-NOsYkvY2A8L9eGaV9uqQJQQ5Nuhb-7_Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHo7dC8u1dwAmiTM2-NOsYkvY2A8L9eGaV9uqQJQQ5Nuhb-7_Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:30:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgR_Fs38Pa8atkvReU0a+wQpNUQzRGoEpgOOs393sFMZHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Emad Omara <emadomara=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Sergio murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io>, Alexandre GOUAILLARD <Alex.GOUAILLARD@cosmosoftware.io>, Patrick McManus <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>, Dispatch WG <dispatch@ietf.org>, sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008b1cfe05a82475ee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/yL9K9OsrRRfMmI6MYrzfAuhm7No>
Subject: Re: [Sframe] Dispatch of SFrame for End-To-End Encrypted Conference Calls
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 19:30:31 -0000
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:20 PM Emad Omara <emadomara= 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Thanks. > > Some responses inline. Other authors please feel free to add more. > > Emad > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:13 PM Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, Patrick. >> >> Authors: It would be helpful to get a little more background: >> >> - How does this work relate to PERC? What problem does it solve that PERC >> doesn’t? >> > This is a completely different approach than PERC. THis draft aims for > simplicity and efficiency. The sdrame draft itself has some benchmarks > against the PERC approach. That being said the sframe draft focuses mainly > on the media encryption part and touches slightly other parts in the system > like key management and integration with WebRTC. If this became a standard > we will have to write a separate draft for each of these two topics. > >> - Do you expect this to become an IETF standard available to anyone to >> implement? Who do you think would implement it? >> > Yes. This will be implemented by the video conference providers. The core > protocol implementation is on the client side. > >> - Is anyone outside of Google working on the spec or implementing the >> protocol? Has anyone outside of Google expressed interest in doing so? >> > Yes, the document is co-authored by +Sergio murillo > <sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io> & +Alexandre GOUAILLARD > <Alex.GOUAILLARD@cosmosoftware.io> from Cosmos Software. > On this last point: We are considering this for some projects at Cisco. --Richard > - Anything else you think would help motivate people to read the draft and >> give feedback :-) >> >> Thanks! >> >> Ben. >> >> On Jun 15, 2020, at 2:05 PM, Patrick McManus <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi All - >> >> I failed to note the link highlighting in Emad's mail to the list which >> already contained the draft. Sorry about that. (It's >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omara-sframe-00 if you too missed it). >> >> There's also a github and mailing list referenced: >> https://github.com/eomara/sframe >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/? >> >> [I've also forked the Subject Line to help interested readers] >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:42 PM Patrick McManus < >> patrick.ducksong@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Sounds really interesting Emad and there's obviously related work going >>> on (at least perc, maybe even mls..). >>> >>> Sending that email Ben mentions to the dispatch list to raise awareness >>> with a link to the draft would be helpful in getting the process started.. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:33 PM Emad Omara <emadomara@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ben, >>>> >>>> This draft proposes a solution for end-to-end encrypted conference >>>> calls. We implemented this in Google a couple of years ago in Duo, but the >>>> draft was only published last month given the current interest in the topic. >>>> >>>> The goal of the session is to go through the proposal and see if there >>>> is interest to continue working on this, and if so what will be the best WG >>>> to host this work. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Emad >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:02 AM Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Emad, >>>>> >>>>> We prioritize DISPATCH meeting time to focus on topics that have had >>>>> DISPATCH list discussion and need high-bandwidth time to resolve. Unless >>>>> I’ve missed something, this topic has not previously come up in DISPATCH. I >>>>> suggest sending a note to this list with some background about the draft >>>>> and how you would like to see it progress. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> Ben. >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 15, 2020, at 12:32 PM, Emad Omara < >>>>> emadomara=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> We would like to have a session in the next IETF to discuss the SFrame >>>>> draft <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omara-sframe-00> Can you >>>>> please help scheduling this? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Emad >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> dispatch mailing list >>>>> dispatch@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> -- > Sframe mailing list > Sframe@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe >
- [Sframe] Request session at IETF 108 dispatch Emad Omara
- Re: [Sframe] [dispatch] Request session at IETF 1… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Sframe] [dispatch] Request session at IETF 1… Emad Omara
- Re: [Sframe] [dispatch] Request session at IETF 1… Patrick McManus
- [Sframe] Dispatch of SFrame for End-To-End Encryp… Patrick McManus
- Re: [Sframe] Dispatch of SFrame for End-To-End En… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Sframe] Dispatch of SFrame for End-To-End En… Emad Omara
- Re: [Sframe] [dispatch] Request session at IETF 1… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Sframe] Dispatch of SFrame for End-To-End En… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Sframe] Dispatch of SFrame for End-To-End En… Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [Sframe] [dispatch] Dispatch of SFrame for En… Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [Sframe] [dispatch] Dispatch of SFrame for En… Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- Re: [Sframe] [dispatch] Dispatch of SFrame for En… Roni Even
- Re: [Sframe] [dispatch] Dispatch of SFrame for En… Alexandre GOUAILLARD