Re: [Sframe] Dispatch of SFrame for End-To-End Encrypted Conference Calls

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Mon, 15 June 2020 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7E03A091C for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jWPQLdVTWu2o for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 027983A08FC for <sframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id w1so16911522qkw.5 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LeNI+1yuLit3/ZWjjJEGC312MJLgqZEh0xA2ccRhqdU=; b=k9ghVVZh7l+bYKjMniVq9UQTl/yQ33JPZj9uOCC6avlnyb/agd91eMHTBDez9hlNOs zv0GxiQt0Vd/KnCc7rpdkHYVRjjBaohvdZkuvz+NZnvuAjKA0uFDygYamlqt9kxHHBxT pTqVLyKPONOcA8NDJeoSLDmcwhPXO5T6IA+wnGxnECFytsyaWHE/Wbp4s985NlpI21bn ZerAPDNYdaMFg2MldmwZJG2Kp3QA7g8wmgJGeJqVBlasSRM7eDyv7mm8PTyh9ZVLxjYN Yj9RQVVXBa2wWqY/UHkwLyGR0APrMuRN/Bs3aBlEuYMWbVtTQXfz4kkjaLTQE2Gx845x O+HQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LeNI+1yuLit3/ZWjjJEGC312MJLgqZEh0xA2ccRhqdU=; b=iOt+gU9eGs/jilMC0x63KqMqSEli8QsawbmnTu+K6ErDCOTtMXlts6Rg9+2NioIlrR MNyrJdvCTU5VEE9Wpk9QXbtPy0pSGjt3a8UCpeScADZOuQOpEgunXw4CtUCmqc/WBaZi pX50pW9ovEZakUlGLef7WsxyrfZv4bpWX8U7X/vnlyF4mhVIeE8bU5U9wLX8qnrHJjhw RZvC5IQxVuVOYXCJdq6+KdJImDnLqnpQ4Z/36mvhSxF3qJlhzcV2iOgSxNqlnsOuB/Yg swYWWCwolhIH7o9scO1Fs+9xSPrQJwGpPv77XLn1LqswJ4Geoog4fZDkdFIy2pOEm6CL djyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ymLXhH8pnkmWhQnKb+66HfveTKDVZXvrO4D2lGSIs+msrhkKV Cxtr14/XV6wpu4WnR6ASj+8I4/Gi9YdI6FJpHnT9Aw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJJGQnMuwUdtw6GoJjHj04m1NXopWdO2wERsaMjPU/S8+dPvk0tJ0FegD7Ya18k2Qk6VdYtKi/agjHOGNkGpE=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:5842:: with SMTP id m63mr17034695qkb.347.1592249427887; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHo7dC8oF4nOkVXf2=igaGdtRYTGk0a=rjkBZ7goYjZP+m25ew@mail.gmail.com> <E8A5F574-7D1B-4BE7-873E-9AFF84C0B3A8@nostrum.com> <CAHo7dC_O13kQdwMmkKcaQ1ctxVKSvv3EqdRfikBhohDaiaujsg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNri5J5p74Niosc4JKPhMOUTeq5hqK2ZjPD-RxQ0w75M6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNrx4cMn20XMrv9zO1jKi8FtEkDLEE7nvc15DKVodJ6NxA@mail.gmail.com> <4425D473-7A6A-4AF5-BA53-635255D6EC55@nostrum.com> <CAHo7dC8u1dwAmiTM2-NOsYkvY2A8L9eGaV9uqQJQQ5Nuhb-7_Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHo7dC8u1dwAmiTM2-NOsYkvY2A8L9eGaV9uqQJQQ5Nuhb-7_Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:30:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgR_Fs38Pa8atkvReU0a+wQpNUQzRGoEpgOOs393sFMZHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Emad Omara <emadomara=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Sergio murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io>, Alexandre GOUAILLARD <Alex.GOUAILLARD@cosmosoftware.io>, Patrick McManus <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>, Dispatch WG <dispatch@ietf.org>, sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008b1cfe05a82475ee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/yL9K9OsrRRfMmI6MYrzfAuhm7No>
Subject: Re: [Sframe] Dispatch of SFrame for End-To-End Encrypted Conference Calls
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 19:30:31 -0000

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:20 PM Emad Omara <emadomara=
40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Thanks.
>
> Some responses inline. Other authors please feel free to add more.
>
> Emad
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:13 PM Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Patrick.
>>
>> Authors: It would be helpful to get a little more background:
>>
>> - How does this work relate to PERC? What problem does it solve that PERC
>> doesn’t?
>>
> This is a completely different approach than PERC. THis draft aims for
> simplicity and efficiency. The sdrame draft itself has some benchmarks
> against the PERC approach.  That being said the sframe draft focuses mainly
> on the media encryption part and touches slightly other parts in the system
> like key management and integration with WebRTC. If this became a standard
> we will have to write a separate draft for each of these two topics.
>
>> - Do you expect this to become an IETF standard available to anyone to
>> implement? Who do you think would implement it?
>>
> Yes. This will be implemented by the  video conference providers. The core
> protocol implementation is on the client side.
>
>> - Is anyone outside of Google working on the spec or implementing the
>> protocol? Has anyone outside of Google expressed interest in doing so?
>>
> Yes, the document is co-authored by +Sergio murillo
> <sergio.garcia.murillo@cosmosoftware.io> & +Alexandre GOUAILLARD
> <Alex.GOUAILLARD@cosmosoftware.io> from Cosmos Software.
>

On this last point: We are considering this for some projects at Cisco.

--Richard



> - Anything else you think would help motivate people to read the draft and
>> give feedback :-)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Ben.
>>
>> On Jun 15, 2020, at 2:05 PM, Patrick McManus <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All -
>>
>> I failed to note the link highlighting in Emad's mail to the list which
>> already contained the draft. Sorry about that. (It's
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omara-sframe-00 if you too missed it).
>>
>> There's also a github and mailing list referenced:
>> https://github.com/eomara/sframe
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/?
>>
>> [I've also forked the Subject Line to help interested readers]
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:42 PM Patrick McManus <
>> patrick.ducksong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds really interesting Emad and there's obviously related work going
>>> on (at least perc, maybe even mls..).
>>>
>>> Sending that email Ben mentions to the dispatch list to raise awareness
>>> with a link to the draft would be helpful in getting the process started..
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:33 PM Emad Omara <emadomara@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ben,
>>>>
>>>> This draft proposes a solution for end-to-end encrypted conference
>>>> calls. We implemented this in Google a couple of years ago in Duo, but the
>>>> draft was only published last month given the current interest in the topic.
>>>>
>>>> The goal of the session is to go through the proposal and see if there
>>>> is interest to continue working on this, and if so what will be the best WG
>>>> to host this work.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Emad
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:02 AM Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Emad,
>>>>>
>>>>> We prioritize DISPATCH meeting time to focus on topics that have had
>>>>> DISPATCH list discussion and need high-bandwidth time to resolve. Unless
>>>>> I’ve missed something, this topic has not previously come up in DISPATCH. I
>>>>> suggest sending a note to this list with some background about the draft
>>>>> and how you would like to see it progress.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Ben.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 15, 2020, at 12:32 PM, Emad Omara <
>>>>> emadomara=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> We would like to have a session in the next IETF to discuss the SFrame
>>>>> draft <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omara-sframe-00> Can you
>>>>> please help scheduling this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Emad
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> dispatch mailing list
>>>>> dispatch@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> --
> Sframe mailing list
> Sframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe
>