Re: [shara] Problem statement
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 28 January 2009 04:39 UTC
Return-Path: <shara-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: shara-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-shara-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8225128C103; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:39:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 4696A3A6BA5 for <shara@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:39:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xifkjeoASZjI for
<shara@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:39:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D493A6850 for <shara@ietf.org>;
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:39:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [202.214.86.146] (helo=rmac.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with
esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from
<randy@psg.com>) id 1LS2DA-000HxY-Cy; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:39:36 +0000
Message-ID: <497FE17E.7030207@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:39:26 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20081204 Thunderbird/3.0b1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com
References: <497F01B1.9030701@ericsson.com> <C5A4D260.1448C%omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
<A99B171D26E1564B92D36826128CD66127E33BC71F@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <A99B171D26E1564B92D36826128CD66127E33BC71F@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Cc: shara@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [shara] Problem statement
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>,
<mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>,
<mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: shara-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: shara-bounces@ietf.org
> a) develop methods for port-restricted IPv4 address allocation (using > dhcp, ipcp, dsmip, mip4, proxy-mip, whatelse), as a new/additional > method for transition to IPv6 > > b) develop solutions for the problems a shared IPv4 address creates: > fragmentation, routing, tunneling, lack of port randomization, etc. > > c) usage of port restricted IP address to improve network > architectures (distributed NATs instead of CGNs, etc) i like "address sharing" as opposed to specifying using port number. there are a few folk thinking of stealing bits from the ip frag ident number instead. i am neither advocating nor dissing this idea. just trying to leave room for it. randy _______________________________________________ shara mailing list shara@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara
- [shara] Problem statement Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [shara] Problem statement Olaf Maennel
- Re: [shara] Problem statement Gabor.Bajko
- Re: [shara] Problem statement Matthew Ford
- Re: [shara] Problem statement Randy Bush
- Re: [shara] Problem statement Gabor.Bajko
- Re: [shara] Problem statement pierre.levis