IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [shara] [BEHAVE] TR: I-DAction:draft-boucadair-pppext-portrange-option-00.txt

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Thu, 05 February 2009 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C9E3A6916; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:29:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.584
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.584 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jVikh0Bp6ZGv; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6E23A67D1; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:29:08 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,388,1231113600"; d="scan'208";a="138550724"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2009 23:29:10 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n15NTA2k004041; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:29:10 -0800
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.194]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n15NT9OS015226; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 23:29:10 GMT
From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
To: <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com>, <shara@ietf.org>
References: <6CF039C5B32037498B02251E11CDE6B007BB7096@ftrdmel3>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:29:08 -0800
Message-ID: <004e01c987e9$8b837df0$c2f0200a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
In-Reply-To: <6CF039C5B32037498B02251E11CDE6B007BB7096@ftrdmel3>
Thread-Index: AcmHmiHQQHeVCnr9Sg+q3yOEBZEYnAAAQO6AABNkjBA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2187; t=1233876550; x=1234740550; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[BEHAVE]=20TR=3A=20I-DAction=3Adraft-bo ucadair-pppext-portrange-option-00.txt |Sender:=20; bh=y4hznzYC9F+xJDpKli3q7q+JgNmd1eEE/XdEFSJht7o=; b=nlG0IPmISBQM7ABJ8b8f4tRMcUq2ILZ6nSGY56p9W1289AaEccRb5TETiP QSfB7FB63IWWjn0BBPAOvl+U7rb3RRKQmvj89QL8/Vu+9c59TtPmIt5Qn/rA Uij++vhWrZ;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: behave@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [shara] [BEHAVE] TR: I-DAction:draft-boucadair-pppext-portrange-option-00.txt
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:29:09 -0000

I like this draft overall, but I would restrict this so that only contiguous
port ranges are permitted.  Non-contiguous subnet masks are difficult for many
people to understand (even today) and I expect there would be similar
confusion with non-contiguous port ranges.

-d


> -----Original Message-----
> From: behave-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:behave-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 6:09 AM
> To: behave@ietf.org; shara@ietf.org
> Subject: [BEHAVE] TR: 
> I-DAction:draft-boucadair-pppext-portrange-option-00.txt
> 
>  
> 
> FYI. A new ID has been submitted to IETF. This draft 
> specifies new PPP IPCP options to be used in the context of 
> Port Range solutions.
> 
> Comments are more than welcome.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de 
> Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
> Envoyé : jeudi 5 février 2009 15:00
> À : i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Objet : I-D Action:draft-boucadair-pppext-portrange-option-00.txt 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line 
> Internet-Drafts directories.
> 
> 	Title           : Port Range Configuration Options for PPP IPCP
> 	Author(s)       : M. Boucadair, et al.
> 	Filename        : draft-boucadair-pppext-portrange-option-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 13
> 	Date            : 2009-02-05
> 
> This memo defines two IPCP (IP Configuration Protocol, 
> [RFC1332]) Options to be used in the context of Port Range 
> solutions.  IPCP is the configuration protocol used when PPP 
> (Point-to-Point Protocol,
> [RFC1548]) is deployed.
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-boucadair-pppext-por
> trange-option-00.txt
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail 
> reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII 
> version of the Internet-Draft.
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email