Re: [shara] Shara scope
Olaf Maennel <omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> Mon, 26 January 2009 15:14 UTC
Return-Path: <shara-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: shara-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-shara-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B430F28C0DB; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:14:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 217AF28C178 for <shara@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:14:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YyPsOK6plz+M for
<shara@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 4660328C0DB for <shara@ietf.org>;
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:14:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69
(FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>) id
1LRT9v-0009Np-IG; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:13:58 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:13:52 +0200
From: Olaf Maennel <omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
To: <pierre.levis@orange-ftgroup.com>
Message-ID: <C5A39FD0.14432%omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
Thread-Topic: [shara] Shara scope
Thread-Index: Acl/s+fQbqY5EJjFQASUaGt+lEYm/wAFMqWv
In-Reply-To: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE0B27BADC@ftrdmel1>
Mime-version: 1.0
Cc: shara@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [shara] Shara scope
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>,
<mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>,
<mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: shara-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: shara-bounces@ietf.org
On 26/01/09 2:45 PM, "pierre.levis@orange-ftgroup.com" <pierre.levis@orange-ftgroup.com> wrote: > Hi, > > So, shara deals with "port range" and softwire deals with DS-lite, which > is fine with me, even if all IPv4 shared address solutions in the same > WG would also make sense. well, i'm a bit confused, ...as i think there is significant overlap. > Shouldn't we integrate a BCP document in the "Proposed Work" section to > cover this item? Basically considerations of where to locate the CGN and > how to route the traffic between customers and CGN? yes. but i don't think we will be able to restrict where to locate the CGN. "all we could do" with port range efforts is to keep the end-customer in control over its own fate (with regards to the translation of course)... olaf _______________________________________________ shara mailing list shara@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara
- [shara] Shara scope pierre.levis
- Re: [shara] Shara scope Olaf Maennel
- Re: [shara] Shara scope teemu.savolainen
- Re: [shara] Shara scope Olaf Maennel
- Re: [shara] Shara scope teemu.savolainen
- Re: [shara] Shara scope Olaf Maennel