IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [shara] port randomization (draft-ymbk-aplusp-03)

"Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <jan@go6.si> Tue, 17 March 2009 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jan@go6.si>
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6725E3A67E5 for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b4ld4ek198qx for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipv6.go6.si (go6.si [212.44.108.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620C23A68C7 for <shara@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.17] (tm.82.192.54.130.dc.telemach.net [82.192.54.130]) (Authenticated sender: jan) by ipv6.go6.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7DA46F1046; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:44:29 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <49BFA93B.3020009@go6.si>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:44:27 +0100
From: "Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <jan@go6.si>
Organization: go6.si
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com
References: <022a01c9a2ab$fd5abf60$fd736b80@cisco.com><49B91C8B.5010906@go6.si><04a201c9a338$d5ce8f70$fd736b80@cisco.com><49B9752B.8030407@go6.si> <051901c9a64a$0256bf40$fd55150a@cisco.com><49BE9F0D.2080804@go6.si><06e601c9a697$e6c67c90$fd55150a@cisco.com><A99B171D26E1564B92D36826128CD66127EE106A92@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com><000c01c9a69f$e7ab3da0$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <49BF8115.307@go6.si> <6CF039C5B32037498B02251E11CDE6B007DB7E13@ftrdmel3> <49BFA22B.9010303@go6.si> <6CF039C5B32037498B02251E11CDE6B007DB7E50@ftrdmel3>
In-Reply-To: <6CF039C5B32037498B02251E11CDE6B007DB7E50@ftrdmel3>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080001020601070001040406"
Cc: Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com, shara@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [shara] port randomization (draft-ymbk-aplusp-03)
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:43:50 -0000

mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> What I missed in your initial answer is why you are referring to 
> offloading the DNS resv to the **core (PRR)**.
Mohamed, hi.

Sorry for the mess. This referred to avoiding to complicate even further 
with port randomization within contiguous, non-contiguous or random port 
ranges allocated to CPE. My personal feeling is that we already did a 
solution complex enough and we might not have to go towards the way of 
making it even more complex.

Thanks, Jan Zorz

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email