Re: [shara] First draft of the shara use cases for review

<mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com> Tue, 17 March 2009 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA073A6AB3 for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UY+8E+gONQgo for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from R-MAIL1.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5259A3A6827 for <shara@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ftrdmel3.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.155]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:23:16 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:23:00 +0100
Message-ID: <6CF039C5B32037498B02251E11CDE6B007DB7B84@ftrdmel3>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [shara] First draft of the shara use cases for review
Thread-Index: AcmmcnJb+F79alS6RZyk4Q6DTv1s3AAWY9Lw
References: <49BEB0D2.6080700@it.uc3m.es>
From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com>
To: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, <shara@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Mar 2009 08:23:16.0338 (UTC) FILETIME=[9F0E0520:01C9A6D9]
Subject: Re: [shara] First draft of the shara use cases for review
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:22:48 -0000

Dear Marcelo, all

Thank you for these slides. Please find below some comments:

- Slide 4: 
1/ To avoid confusion with overlapped port ranges, I suggest to have something like (IP1, PR1), (IP1, PR2) etc, assigned to port restricted devices instead of P1...P2, P2...P2 notation. 
2/ Port Range Router is not **necessarily** connected to what you call "rest of Internet IPv4".
3/ What is the role of the two represented PRRs? 

- Slide 5: Idem as slide 4

- Slide 7: 
1/ Why you need a tunnel between represented two routers? 


FYI, additional IPv6-related use cases are defined in draft-boucadair-behave-ipv6-portrange-01. Two modes are defined: encapsulation and translation mode:
The encapsulation mode uses a stateless function called SMAP (Stateless A+P Mapping). A SMAP function may be embedded in a PRR or a port restricted device. A port restricted device may be a CPE, PDA, terminal, etc. I reproduce hereafter these use cases:

- Use IPv6 for incoming traffic destined to a shared IP address. No alteration is required for outgoing traffic.

                  +----------+
         --IPv4---|----------|------------IPv4--------------------\
         ---------|----------|------------------------------------/
                  |          |
                  | +------+ |               +------+
                  | |      | | /----IPv6-----|      |
         /--IPv4--| | SMAP | |//---IPv4----  | SMAP |/---IPv4----
         \--------| |      | |\\-----------  |      |\-----------
                  | |      | | \-------------|      |
                  | +------+ |               +------+
                  |          |
                  +----------+
                     node A                    node B

- IPv6 is used in both directions

                       +------+             +------+
                       |      |----IPv6---\ |      |
           ----IPv4---\|      |----IPv4---\\|      |----IPv4---\
           -----------/|      |-----------//|      |-----------/
                       |      |-----------/ |      |
                       | SMAP |             | SMAP |
                       |      | /----IPv6---|      |
           /---IPv4----|      |//---IPv4----|      |/---IPv4----
           \-----------|      |\\-----------|      |\-----------
                       |      | \-----------|      |
                       +------+             +------+
                        node A               node B

Two interconnection scenarios may be envisaged as listed below:

- Interconnection scenario 1:

+------+           +------+   +--------+   +------+           +------+
|      |--IPv6---\ |      |   |        |   |      |---IPv6--\ |      |
|      |--IPv4---\\|      |---|-IPv4---|--\|      |---IPv4--\\|      |
|      |---------//|      |---|--------|--/|      |---------//|      |
|      |---------/ |      |   |Internet|   |      |---------/ |      |
| SMAP |           | SMAP |   |  IPv4  |   | SMAP |           | SMAP |
|      | /---IPv6--|      |   |        |   |      | /---IPv6--|      |
|      |//---IPv4--|      |/--|-IPv4---|---|      |//--IPv4---|      |
|      |\\---------|      |\--|--------|---|      |\\---------|      |
|      | \---------|      |   |        |   |      | \---------|      |
+------+           +------+   +--------+   +------+           +------+
  Source            node A                  node B           Destination


- Interconnection scenario 2:

   +------+             +------------+              +------+
   |      |             |            |              |      |
   |      |----IPv6-----|----IPv6----|----IPv6----\ |      |
   |      |----IPv4-----|------------|----IPv4----\\|      |
   |      |-------------|------------|------------//|      |
   |      |-------------|------------|------------/ |      |
   | SMAP |             | Internet v6|              | SMAP |
   |      | /-----IPv6--|------------|-----IPv6-----|      |
   |      |//---IPv4----|------------|-------IPv4---|      |
   |      |\\-----------|------------|--------------|      |
   |      | \-----------|------------|--------------|      |
   |      |             |            |              |      |
   +------+             +------------+              +------+
    Source                                            Destination

Cheers
Med
 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : shara-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:shara-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de marcelo bagnulo braun
Envoyé : lundi 16 mars 2009 21:05
À : shara@ietf.org
Objet : [shara] First draft of the shara use cases for review

Hi,

I have done a first version of the slides describing the SHARA use cases Find them at:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/slides/shara-0.pdf

Comments are welcome.
The suppose to reflect the recent disucssion on scenarios on the ml

Regards, marcelo

_______________________________________________
shara mailing list
shara@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara