Re: [shara] Problem statement

Olaf Maennel <omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> Tue, 27 January 2009 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <shara-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: shara-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-shara-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97283A6879; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:02:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF083A6879 for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:02:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3fYgaPp59ZF1 for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:02:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB673A681F for <shara@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:02:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>) id 1LRnZi-000InX-6k; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:01:56 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:01:52 +0200
From: Olaf Maennel <omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <C5A4D260.1448C%omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
Thread-Topic: [shara] Problem statement
Thread-Index: AcmAf2wfVuXa7DXEYkmX9i8R71QoaA==
In-Reply-To: <497F01B1.9030701@ericsson.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Cc: shara@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [shara] Problem statement
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: shara-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: shara-bounces@ietf.org

Hi, 

could section 1 and 1.1 from our tech-report (see
http://mice.cs.columbia.edu/getTechreport.php?techreportID=560) serve as a
beginning for this problem statement? or should it better come from a
different direction?

    olaf


On 27/01/09 2:44 PM, "Magnus Westerlund" <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I would like to see a better Problem Statement for SHARA. I already
> gotten questions about the problem statement. I can kind of guess having
> been involved in the discussion of the related work. But I think there
> is need for a collected problem statement for SHARA.
> 
> This also relates to a question that needs to be answered i a good way
> to enable chartering. Why the problem scope and intended solution
> proposed? I interpreted Pierre Levis' comments that there clearly are
> other solutions and what about them. From my perspective as an AD I
> don't think "let all flowers bloom" is the answer to the IPv4-Ipv6
> coexistence and migration issues. We are here to provide recommended
> solutions within a reasonable time frame so that it actually can impact
> the market. We don't have forever here, and that is why dual-stack lite
> was chartered, what appeared to be a reasonable solution and one which
> we can think IETF can finish documenting this year.
> 
> So is what SHARA proposes necessary, a sufficient improvement, resolve
> previously non-handled issues? Should we do it now or focus on first
> completing the already chartered items in Softwire and Behave?
> 
> For your knowledge, I need most of these answers quickly. The IESG and
> IAB have their call to discuss the BOFs next Thursday. By then I need to
> know as much as possible to have the right discussion about this BOF
> proposal's approval or not.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Magnus Westerlund
> 
> IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> shara mailing list
> shara@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara


_______________________________________________
shara mailing list
shara@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara