Re: [shara] Problem statement
Olaf Maennel <omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> Tue, 27 January 2009 13:02 UTC
Return-Path: <shara-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: shara-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-shara-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id E97283A6879; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:02:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 1DF083A6879 for <shara@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:02:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3fYgaPp59ZF1 for
<shara@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:02:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB673A681F for <shara@ietf.org>;
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:02:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69
(FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>) id
1LRnZi-000InX-6k; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:01:56 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:01:52 +0200
From: Olaf Maennel <omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <C5A4D260.1448C%omaennel@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
Thread-Topic: [shara] Problem statement
Thread-Index: AcmAf2wfVuXa7DXEYkmX9i8R71QoaA==
In-Reply-To: <497F01B1.9030701@ericsson.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Cc: shara@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [shara] Problem statement
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>,
<mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>,
<mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: shara-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: shara-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, could section 1 and 1.1 from our tech-report (see http://mice.cs.columbia.edu/getTechreport.php?techreportID=560) serve as a beginning for this problem statement? or should it better come from a different direction? olaf On 27/01/09 2:44 PM, "Magnus Westerlund" <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to see a better Problem Statement for SHARA. I already > gotten questions about the problem statement. I can kind of guess having > been involved in the discussion of the related work. But I think there > is need for a collected problem statement for SHARA. > > This also relates to a question that needs to be answered i a good way > to enable chartering. Why the problem scope and intended solution > proposed? I interpreted Pierre Levis' comments that there clearly are > other solutions and what about them. From my perspective as an AD I > don't think "let all flowers bloom" is the answer to the IPv4-Ipv6 > coexistence and migration issues. We are here to provide recommended > solutions within a reasonable time frame so that it actually can impact > the market. We don't have forever here, and that is why dual-stack lite > was chartered, what appeared to be a reasonable solution and one which > we can think IETF can finish documenting this year. > > So is what SHARA proposes necessary, a sufficient improvement, resolve > previously non-handled issues? Should we do it now or focus on first > completing the already chartered items in Softwire and Behave? > > For your knowledge, I need most of these answers quickly. The IESG and > IAB have their call to discuss the BOFs next Thursday. By then I need to > know as much as possible to have the right discussion about this BOF > proposal's approval or not. > > Cheers > > Magnus Westerlund > > IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 > Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > shara mailing list > shara@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara _______________________________________________ shara mailing list shara@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara
- [shara] Problem statement Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [shara] Problem statement Olaf Maennel
- Re: [shara] Problem statement Gabor.Bajko
- Re: [shara] Problem statement Matthew Ford
- Re: [shara] Problem statement Randy Bush
- Re: [shara] Problem statement Gabor.Bajko
- Re: [shara] Problem statement pierre.levis