IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [shara] Summary and outcomes from aplusp BoF at IETF 76

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Thu, 10 December 2009 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1C23A67FA for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:55:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.757
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.757 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.204, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY=1.643]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GVyMes+si9AL for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E98833A672F for <shara@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:55:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 89870 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2009 13:28:36 -0000
Received: from softbank219001188006.bbtec.net (HELO necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp) (219.1.188.6) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 10 Dec 2009 13:28:36 -0000
Message-ID: <4B20EE0A.7020203@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:48:10 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja-JP; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: ja, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: remi.despres@free.fr
References: <8FD04E6A-62DF-4606-A374-CBE657F0CF0B@cisco.com> <2927_1260194664_4B1D0B68_2927_2219_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F30EF2B00588@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <EFDE258A-6C69-4FEB-A8F5-CB5DA6BF7F09@cisco.com> <14682_1260426885_4B209685_14682_2786_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F30EF2BBC9B5@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <4B20D917.5090003@free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4B20D917.5090003@free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "shara@ietf.org" <shara@ietf.org>, Chairs <softwire-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Softwire@core3.amsl.com
Subject: Re: [shara] Summary and outcomes from aplusp BoF at IETF 76
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:55:30 -0000

Remi Depres wrote:

> First, I agree with the list of positive points of A+P he listed.
> It is a useful contribution to balance the list of negative points
> of Dave's presentation in Hiroshima. (This list BTW has been challenged 
> during the BOF, with too little time to argue technically).

As I challenged with running code during the BoF, there was no more
technical discussion necessary to dismiss it, which was why people
in the BoF could not have argued against A+P based on it.

After the BoF, his presentation was totally dismissed with no one,
not even Dave Thaler himself, actively supporting its validity.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email