IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [shara] [BEHAVE] TR: I-DAction:draft-boucadair-pppext-portrange-option-00.txt

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Fri, 06 February 2009 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909303A6B35; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:47:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82lci584LM5j; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:47:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE763A6827; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:47:22 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,390,1231113600"; d="scan'208";a="244070903"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2009 06:47:25 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n166lOl0008804; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:47:24 -0800
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.194]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n166lOon003373; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:47:24 GMT
From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
To: "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>, <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com>
References: <6CF039C5B32037498B02251E11CDE6B007BB7096@ftrdmel3><004e01c987e9$8b837df0$c2f0200a@cisco.com><m2hc38zcd3.wl%randy@psg.com><E9CACA3D8417CE409FE3669AAE1E5A4F118EB4D7AF@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com><6CF039C5B32037498B02251E11CDE6B007BB734A@ftrdmel3> <m24oz8ysny.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:47:24 -0800
Message-ID: <014a01c98826$c4ad5b40$c2f0200a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
In-Reply-To: <m24oz8ysny.wl%randy@psg.com>
Thread-Index: AcmIJdN79YJSKSXQQBeU8fwSnJwtIAAAMCiA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=244; t=1233902844; x=1234766844; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[BEHAVE]=20[shara]TR=3A=09I-DAction=3Ad raft-boucadair-pppext-portrange-option-00.txt |Sender:=20; bh=+f4vOHe1BX1etL5tTKYT9nPa8RMcS3UWmqGyl0YN2sM=; b=Nc9B5gk0HOFb87u0a06bMD/37iqweEZWufU0s6ip4+tohp/2sHYkq69u+Y O9rV9EmZq2muXYaM5bMS87FEKYZrDDN5Wjy37sthO10N1pMTgAc02+ivJ1w4 cRZSUKnmJ1o1vUUhAtkTQVmMRVooByZRIJH0/WFjR8smaaiqwIpRk=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: behave@ietf.org, shara@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [shara] [BEHAVE] TR: I-DAction:draft-boucadair-pppext-portrange-option-00.txt
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:47:23 -0000

> > subnets need to be hierarchical 
> 
> fwiw, paul francis publiched a scheme back in about '92 where
> subnet masks were not contiguous.  it was self-consistent.

Can you describe the adoption of the scheme in the last 16 years?

-d

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email