Re: [shara] SHARA preliminary agenda posted

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Fri, 06 November 2009 07:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253AC3A6842 for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:29:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yJgmYLLKTDva for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:29:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6BD3A67FB for <shara@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:29:52 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAEtf80qrR7H+/2dsb2JhbACKYLoomBKEPQSBZooS
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,691,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="426149532"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2009 07:30:15 +0000
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.198]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA67UFUg009878; Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:30:15 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'mkarir' <mkarir@merit.edu>, shara@ietf.org
References: <070301ca5e44$5534c830$c6f0200a@cisco.com><7C6E75E7-CC63-4E19-BD13-0F2C74E3C009@lilacglade.org><074501ca5e49$ffea7720$c6f0200a@cisco.com> <3AB6BB55-02C2-478F-A9CA-117E632A33DA@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:30:18 -0800
Message-ID: <093d01ca5eb2$fd96ab60$c6f0200a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <3AB6BB55-02C2-478F-A9CA-117E632A33DA@merit.edu>
Thread-Index: AcpeXf/L8AxjEtAuSHSFO5SdlAxL1QAVBQuw
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Subject: Re: [shara] SHARA preliminary agenda posted
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:29:56 -0000

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: shara-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:shara-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of mkarir
> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:22 PM
> To: shara@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [shara] SHARA preliminary agenda posted
> 
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Though we wont be able to make it to the BoF in Hiroshima, I thought  
> we would let folks
> know about our L2 based approach to implementing port sharing.
> Both the paper description as well as working code are at:
> 
> http://software.merit.edu/pe-arp/
> 
> We recently also presented our work at the NANOG meeting:
> 
> http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Tuesday/Ka
> rir_pearp_N47_Tues.pdf
> 
> We do not have an IETF draft yet, but expect to have one 
> ready for the next IETF mtg.

Interesting, thanks for forwarding.

Slide 6, "DNS Support for Service Location" talks about
enhancing DNS to do port lookups.  You might look at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jennings-http-srv which
proposes a new URI scheme "http+srv:"

-d


> 
> -manish
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 5, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:mrw@lilacglade.org]
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 10:30 AM
> >> To: Dan Wing
> >> Cc: shara@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [shara] SHARA preliminary agenda posted
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Dan,
> >>
> >> There doesn't seem to be an A+P document on the agenda...
> >>
> >> When we talk about A+P, are we specifically discussing
> >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ymbk-aplusp-05.txt?
> >
> > No, by "A+P" we are generalizing to include solutions that
> > provide TCP/UDP ports to a subscriber, including so far:
> >
> >  A+P, draft-ymbk-aplusp
> >  Port Range, draft-boucadair-port-range
> >  Port Range + IPv6, draft-boucadair-behave-ipv6-portrange
> >  SAM, draft-despres-softwire-mesh-sam
> >  Dual IVI, draft-xli-behave-divi
> >
> > Pierre Levis's presentation provides a high level overview
> > of A+P without going into the differences of those I-Ds
> > on the wire.
> >
> > -d
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Margaret
> >>
> >> On Nov 5, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is still subject to change, as Christian is traveling, but I
> >>> believe this
> >>> is close to our agenda for the APLUSP BoF,
> >>>
> >>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09nov/agenda/aplusp.html
> >>>
> >>> -d
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> shara mailing list
> >>> shara@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > shara mailing list
> > shara@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara
> 
> _______________________________________________
> shara mailing list
> shara@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara