IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [shara] port randomization (draft-ymbk-aplusp-03)

<mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com> Tue, 17 March 2009 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C353A6876 for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C57mCqlItX2w for <shara@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2186F3A67F2 for <shara@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ftrdmel3.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.155]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:58:41 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9A700.1369D8BC"
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:58:31 +0100
Message-ID: <6CF039C5B32037498B02251E11CDE6B007DB7E13@ftrdmel3>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [shara] port randomization (draft-ymbk-aplusp-03)
Thread-Index: Acmm7pcH4cMO5T/iQW6oLTiWpwRZwwAESU6w
References: <022a01c9a2ab$fd5abf60$fd736b80@cisco.com><49B91C8B.5010906@go6.si><04a201c9a338$d5ce8f70$fd736b80@cisco.com><49B9752B.8030407@go6.si> <051901c9a64a$0256bf40$fd55150a@cisco.com><49BE9F0D.2080804@go6.si><06e601c9a697$e6c67c90$fd55150a@cisco.com><A99B171D26E1564B92D36826128CD66127EE106A92@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com><000c01c9a69f$e7ab3da0$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <49BF8115.307@go6.si>
From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com>
To: <jan@go6.si>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Mar 2009 12:58:41.0295 (UTC) FILETIME=[18B259F0:01C9A700]
Cc: Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com, shara@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [shara] port randomization (draft-ymbk-aplusp-03)
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:58:00 -0000

Dear Jan,
 
What does mean to offload the DNS resolving to the core?
 
Cheers,
Med 

  _____  

De : shara-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:shara-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Jan Zorz @ go6.si
Envoyé : mardi 17 mars 2009 11:53
À : Dan Wing
Cc : Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com; shara@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [shara] port randomization (draft-ymbk-aplusp-03)



Pierre joined me with my question, how big allocation of ports is big enough for randomisation. Let's try to find out that first.
The other suggestion, that I found quite interesting (if not brilliant) is to offload DNS resolving to the core (PRR?) and do port randomisation there. 

Regards, Jan Zorz

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email