IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [shara] [BEHAVE] TR: I-DAction:draft-boucadair-pppext-portrange-option-00.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 07 February 2009 05:20 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shara@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E6E3A68A9; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:20:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.496, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sz6WkdLPSeeC; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:20:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFC73A67A8; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rmac.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1LVfcT-000IKQ-5l; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:20:45 +0000
Received: from rmac.psg.com.psg.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rmac.psg.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA592C4078; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:58:47 +0800 (HKT)
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:58:47 +0800
Message-ID: <m23aesyrtk.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <014a01c98826$c4ad5b40$c2f0200a@cisco.com>
References: <6CF039C5B32037498B02251E11CDE6B007BB7096@ftrdmel3> <004e01c987e9$8b837df0$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <m2hc38zcd3.wl%randy@psg.com> <E9CACA3D8417CE409FE3669AAE1E5A4F118EB4D7AF@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <6CF039C5B32037498B02251E11CDE6B007BB734A@ftrdmel3> <m24oz8ysny.wl%randy@psg.com> <014a01c98826$c4ad5b40$c2f0200a@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.3 (i386-apple-darwin9.6.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: behave@ietf.org, shara@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [shara] [BEHAVE] TR: I-DAction:draft-boucadair-pppext-portrange-option-00.txt
X-BeenThere: shara@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sharing of an IPv4 Address discussion list <shara.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shara>
List-Post: <mailto:shara@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shara>, <mailto:shara-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:20:46 -0000

>>> subnets need to be hierarchical 
>> fwiw, paul francis publiched a scheme back in about '92 where
>> subnet masks were not contiguous.  it was self-consistent.
> Can you describe the adoption of the scheme in the last 16 years?

no need to.  the point is that they need not be.  you are not
required to like it.

randy

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email