[shim6] Deployment experience with Shim6 and MIPv6?
Alberto García <firstname.lastname@example.org> Thu, 22 December 2011 12:18 UTC
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8A021F8A6C for <email@example.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:18:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([22.214.171.124]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R-eR5LFmIeE5 for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:18:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (smtp03.uc3m.es [126.96.36.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBE221F8A56 for <email@example.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BOMBO (unknown [188.8.131.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp03.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB4B9C5F53; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:18:11 +0100 (CET)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Alberto_Garc=EDa?= <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:18:12 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D5_01CCC0AC.284CEE20"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Cc: 'shim6' <email@example.com>
Subject: [shim6] Deployment experience with Shim6 and MIPv6?
List-Id: SHIM6 Working Group Mailing List <shim6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/shim6>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:18:17 -0000
Hi Sebastien, In his review of draft-garcia-shim6-applicability ( <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-garcia-shim6-applicability-02.txt> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-garcia-shim6-applicability-02.txt), Jari has raised a comment about the experience on Shim6 and MIPv6 combinations, and IPsec: | [Jari Arkko said:] | | Section 7 should indicate if there is any implementation of deployment | experience with these combinations. I'm doubtful on whether all the ipsec | layering mechanisms and so on would actually work in real implementations | without someone having tested such combinations. I think you worked on a MipShim6 code, and there is a paper in French describing the tests. As far as I understand from the paper, you tested the scenario described in 7.1.1 in draft-garcia-shim6-applicability-02, and I think it worked. Is this right? Im not sure if you tested the scenario described in 7.1.2. Besides, Im not sure about the IPsec configuration used for the tests (or if IPsec could not be used at all in your implementation). Can you provide us some information on this subject? Thanks in advance, Alberto
- [shim6] Deployment experience with Shim6 and MI... Alberto García
- Re: [shim6] Deployment experience with Shim6 an... Jari Arkko