Re: [shim6] Exit selection [New Version Notification - draft-mrw-nat66-08.txt]

Scott W Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Fri, 11 March 2011 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: shim6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shim6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A3A3A6944 for <shim6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:06:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m4lAgBjVMmMs for <shim6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:06:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA913A68B1 for <shim6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:06:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so3693807iwl.31 for <shim6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:08:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=HzSqe4H5daYx9K/3rZfOGxfwx9jJNgLiFnDA4U1ZB1k=; b=pspQH0EMl7gd5gamFlagiUvxjoqowEoh+mHkHAh0VfwVvmbGgLvLMWju4mp8cMzrgN TguzdunDTotfTkKmkUhALLIpyi14GDFbhwBBis6531Vr1gRXaXZS3KLmHTCQTD7Eshz1 Dj5AevfVaV3PrSIjJDwwh0EHA7c2jdY4UPKr0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=trvSBG0DTggt3Xe85PFl68F5c7x1/i9xuHd16bUc65SZqOx+F5OBrHY/vIIxq48wwz 2D0GEAM6yNLYZ/xvxIjJLtwXD+3DoDD3SDel1w5AGGok0kRwtRj/lLJIOLMrYehdPgH+ 9ifWgqNQwsDTm8+caTX7z+avZt4/fITn5zeUY=
Received: by 10.42.189.200 with SMTP id df8mr2830055icb.33.1299874098123; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:08:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.114.81 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:07:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D7A7666.1040602@gmail.com>
References: <20110228223003.13022.10464.idtracker@localhost> <845A4F08-46E7-48EE-B294-0C8368BAD1CB@cisco.com> <20110302072822.GA20321@serpens.de> <5AC61190-49B0-49B5-ACB1-1FA5082C0380@cisco.com> <20110302203006.GI23030@serpens.de> <4D6EB08E.9000109@gmail.com> <20110302214913.GG20321@serpens.de> <4D6EC293.90608@gmail.com> <20110303065132.GH20321@serpens.de> <4D6FF098.6010600@gmail.com> <A3C0405F-F5E1-4911-A67B-CB3FCD153B29@free.fr> <4D7689CC.7060409@gmail.com> <4D76A5FF.2020704@uclouvain.be> <4D76C461.30506@gmail.com> <C3AC5E50-1E3F-4381-A0A4-B5023EBA529B@free.fr> <AANLkTi=Yej0=a1q7GejBGBCjXJQrLA90J9+xpcimTuXr@mail.gmail.com> <4D7A7666.1040602@gmail.com>
From: Scott W Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:07:58 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTim8_sfLBmjTVHXtZhi6t2ZvLwOEM-VJszXJmrKi@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303ea5eadf1255049e3a8539
Cc: "S.P.Zeidler" <spz@serpens.de>, shim6-wg <shim6@ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [shim6] Exit selection [New Version Notification - draft-mrw-nat66-08.txt]
X-BeenThere: shim6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SHIM6 Working Group Mailing List <shim6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shim6>
List-Post: <mailto:shim6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:07:00 -0000

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:22, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Scott,
>
> That may well be true, but shouldn't we work here to define the
> requirements from the shim6 point of view?
>

OK, sounds good.


> I must go and read the MIF documents sometime. It could be they
> have already defined sufficient requirements for shim6.


When you do, and you feel frustrated, please contribute :-)