Re: [shim6] Exit selection [New Version Notification - draft-mrw-nat66-08.txt]

Sébastien Barré <sebastien.barre@uclouvain.be> Tue, 08 March 2011 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sebastien.barre@uclouvain.be>
X-Original-To: shim6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shim6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BB43A659B for <shim6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:55:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZGUwROjE8N89 for <shim6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:55:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.sgsi.ucl.ac.be (smtp.sgsi.ucl.ac.be [130.104.5.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9536E3A63C9 for <shim6@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:55:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.103] (unknown [83.101.32.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sbarre@smtp1.sgsi.ucl.ac.be) by smtp1.sgsi.ucl.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF648E9853; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:56:15 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4D76A5FF.2020704@uclouvain.be>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:56:15 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbiBCYXJyw6k=?= <sebastien.barre@uclouvain.be>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); nl; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <20110228223003.13022.10464.idtracker@localhost> <845A4F08-46E7-48EE-B294-0C8368BAD1CB@cisco.com> <20110302072822.GA20321@serpens.de> <5AC61190-49B0-49B5-ACB1-1FA5082C0380@cisco.com> <20110302203006.GI23030@serpens.de> <4D6EB08E.9000109@gmail.com> <20110302214913.GG20321@serpens.de> <4D6EC293.90608@gmail.com> <20110303065132.GH20321@serpens.de> <4D6FF098.6010600@gmail.com> <A3C0405F-F5E1-4911-A67B-CB3FCD153B29@free.fr> <4D7689CC.7060409@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D7689CC.7060409@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97-exp at smtp-1.sipr-dc.ucl.ac.be
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=; client-ip=83.101.32.77; helo=[192.168.1.103]
Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=; client-ip=83.101.32.77; envelope-from=<sebastien.barre@uclouvain.be>
X-Sgsi-Spamcheck: SASL authenticated,
X-SGSI-MailScanner-ID: BF648E9853.00000
X-SGSI-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-SGSI-From: sebastien.barre@uclouvain.be
X-SGSI-Spam-Status: No
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?UsOpbWkgRGVzcHLDqXM=?= <remi.despres@free.fr>, shim6-wg <shim6@ietf.org>, "S.P.Zeidler" <spz@serpens.de>
Subject: Re: [shim6] Exit selection [New Version Notification - draft-mrw-nat66-08.txt]
X-BeenThere: shim6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SHIM6 Working Group Mailing List <shim6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shim6>
List-Post: <mailto:shim6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:55:06 -0000

Hi,

Op 08-03-11 20:55, Brian E Carpenter schreef:
>
> Where is the implementation report, BTW?
I have proposed an implementation report a while ago, but received no 
comment about it (as far as I remember).
It is now an expired draft, but I can revive it if there is motivation 
from people to review it. It can still be downloaded from here: 
http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be/publications/shim6-implementation-report-linshim6

If anyone is interested in reviewing/commenting on it, I will be happy 
to apply the comments and do my best to improve it. We can also discuss 
in Prague as I will be there.

regards,

Sébastien.
> And when will the applicability
> draft be ready for the IESG?
>
>        Brian
>
>> In a site using ULAs and having several links, a complement is therefore needed.
>> SAM is an approach for this (ref. draft-despres-softwire-sam-01 - sec. 3.3), and AFAIK the only documented one so far.
>> Would you agree on this?
>>
>> RD
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> shim6 mailing list
> shim6@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6

-- 
Sébastien Barré
Researcher,
CSE department, UCLouvain, Belgium
http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be/sbarre