Re: [shim6] AD review of draft-garcia-shim6-applicability-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 22 December 2011 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: shim6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shim6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BB621F84D5 for <shim6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:05:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.344
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.344 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C4Htuj3EiMFB for <shim6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:05:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B0D21F84C9 for <shim6@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:05:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eekc14 with SMTP id c14so7572881eek.31 for <shim6@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:05:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=taWuf4ZX8K46JQP5G0wSD2QBnzBFqWuzsviupJJxdac=; b=TT6CoNKLoysn6jGHBS8RaJkLmLUZy5Yd3z7pGwIO9gEp8C1lzEdG32B7eVJ4vuIHXK z0//1/iy2ZJbUmA2Q05OLLQZ3QHyzqxLNdeoPkZjGS9mXlAdM3E8uMR1Sr6c7ougxrnL CQH+zr/4D72axJ6rFtuNwjvU1Sos+w+4u0/AM=
Received: by 10.213.35.65 with SMTP id o1mr2505664ebd.47.1324591503287; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:05:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.1.1.4] ([121.98.251.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y12sm38496338eeb.11.2011.12.22.14.04.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:05:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EF3A985.50004@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:04:53 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?QWxiZXJ0byBHYXJjw61h?= <alberto@it.uc3m.es>
References: <4EF089CF.5070300@piuha.net> <00d901ccc0a3$c68c7dc0$53a57940$@it.uc3m.es> <4EF33EDB.5010806@piuha.net> <011901ccc0d0$467030f0$d35092d0$@it.uc3m.es>
In-Reply-To: <011901ccc0d0$467030f0$d35092d0$@it.uc3m.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 'marcelo bagnulo braun' <marcelo@bagnulo.net>, 'shim6' <shim6@ietf.org>, 'Joe Abley' <joe.abley@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [shim6] AD review of draft-garcia-shim6-applicability-00.txt
X-BeenThere: shim6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SHIM6 Working Group Mailing List <shim6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shim6>
List-Post: <mailto:shim6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:05:05 -0000

> "In order to successfully deploy Shim6 in a multihomed site, additional
> mechanism may be required to solve issues such as selecting the source
> address appropriate to the destination and to the outgoing provider, or to
> allow the network manager to perform traffic engineering. Such problems are
> not specific of Shim6, but are suffered by the hosts of any site which is
> connected to multiple transit providers, and which receives an IPv6 prefix
> from each of them. Some of these mechanisms are not defined today."

I fully agree with this text, but if possible can you emphasise even more
that these problems are problems of sites with multiple prefixes and *in
no way* caused by shim6? Actually shim6 reduces the impact of these problems,
because if there is a working path shim6 will find it, which is also true
for MPTCP and happy-eyeballs, but *not* true for vanilla IPv6.

Regards
   Brian