Re: [shim6] Preparing for a BoF about name-based sockets.
Javier Ubillos <email@example.com> Wed, 15 September 2010 08:09 UTC
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA173A6936 for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([188.8.131.52]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qUsYNcRH1WCd for <email@example.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from letter.sics.se (letter.sics.se [184.108.40.206]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F4E3A68E7 for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [220.127.116.11] (bit.sics.se [18.104.22.168]) (Authenticated sender: email@example.com) by letter.sics.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89A4440114; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:09:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Javier Ubillos <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: shim6 <email@example.com>
References: <1284491822.2019.18.camel@bit> <4C902878.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+Ye1HN+mQWbb0YxNsK8p"
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:09:52 +0200
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3
Cc: Zhongxing Ming <email@example.com>, Christian Vogt <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: [shim6] Preparing for a BoF about name-based sockets.
List-Id: SHIM6 Working Group Mailing List <shim6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:09:29 -0000
Hi shim6. We are preparing for a BoF on name-based sockets for Beijing and are looking for feedback on what we should (and should not) cover. Feel free to join in to the discussion on email@example.com. // Javier On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:59 +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Maybe you need to discuss this on the shim6 list, where the current > plan is probably to have no meeting in Beijing since the main work > is finished. > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > > On 2010-09-15 07:17, Javier Ubillos wrote: > > Hi everyone. > > > > We think we got some good feedback after the two presentation at > > Maastricht, so we've decided to move towards a BoF. > > > > We are writing to you to ask for some input and feedback. > > > > We would like to talk some about ID/Loc (names & locators) in general > > and explore if there is more room within the IETF for it. > > The short version is: Today we have ID/Loc splits at different levels, > > however we think that are some advantages to this one. > > > > Relevant documents: > > BoF Proposal: https://www.sics.se/nbs/bof/Proposal%20for%20Name-Based% > > 20Sockets%20BoF.pdf > > Draft: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ubillos-name-based-sockets-02.txt > > > > About the draft: Please note, the draft _will_ be divided into two > > different documents, one about name based sockets, and one about how > > shim6 can be improved with name-based sockets. > > We have been a bit unclear earlier, name-based sockets is about the > > naming layer & mechanisms. The described shim6 improvements are an > > example on solutions that can be improved and integrated using > > name-based sockets. > > > > // Christan Vogt and Javier Ubillos > >
- Re: [shim6] Preparing for a BoF about name-based … Javier Ubillos