Re: [shim6] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-shim6-applicability
Alberto García <alberto@it.uc3m.es> Wed, 06 October 2010 09:55 UTC
Return-Path: <alberto@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: shim6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shim6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BB53A6EE1 for <shim6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 02:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.632, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dbx8sYcfY+hd for <shim6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 02:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (smtp02.uc3m.es [163.117.176.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F0C3A6B2A for <shim6@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 02:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from bombo (bombo.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp02.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A2A704071; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:56:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Alberto García <alberto@it.uc3m.es>
To: 'Brian E Carpenter' <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 'Geoff Huston' <gih@apnic.net>
References: <AF53E127-EBA8-4B65-ACFD-B9B5A0071B8A@apnic.net> <4CAA687F.7090002@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:56:10 +0200
Message-ID: <BCE37A03CFFC45B786DA22DA29A3A008@bombo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <4CAA687F.7090002@gmail.com>
Thread-Index: ActkHx1jtdCjAgMEQxi4Ev8Sk0SmPgBEEpCQ
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.0.0.1038-17686.006
Cc: shim6-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-shim6-applicability@tools.ietf.org, 'shim6' <shim6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [shim6] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-shim6-applicability
X-BeenThere: shim6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SHIM6 Working Group Mailing List <shim6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shim6>
List-Post: <mailto:shim6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:55:16 -0000
Hi Thanks for your review! I include your comments for the next version of the draft. Comments inline: | -----Mensaje original----- | De: shim6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:shim6-bounces@ietf.org] En nombre de | Brian E Carpenter | Enviado el: martes, 05 de octubre de 2010 1:51 | Para: Geoff Huston | CC: shim6-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-shim6-applicability@tools.ietf.org; | shim6 | Asunto: Re: [shim6] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-shim6-applicability | | Hi, | | I believe this draft is ready for the IESG. I've noted some minor | points below, which could be fixed now or later. | | Brian | | Nits and editorial: | =================== | | > This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF | > Contributions published or made publicly available before November | > 10, 2008. | | Do we need this bit of legal junk? Unless there is specific old | material and its authors are not available to say "OK", there is | no need for this. So which old material written by who is included? Yes, we don't need this part. I change the ipr claim so that this does not appear. | | > Regarding to the outbound traffic to H, | | --> Regarding the outbound traffic to H, | | > IPv4 addressed can be | | --> IPv4 addresses can be | | > [RFC3704] proposes that non-PI addresses should ensure that each | > packet is delivered to the provider related with the prefix of its | > source address. | | This is very contorted English. Maybe: | | [RFC3704] requires that sites using non-PI addresses should ensure that each | packet is delivered to the provider whose prefix matches its source address. | | > These routers maintain as many parallel routing tables | > as valid source prefixes are, | | --> These routers maintain as many parallel routing tables | as there are valid source prefixes, | | > It is worth to note that | | --> It is worth noting that | | > In particular, the use of HBA/CGA prevents on-path and | > off-path attackers to introduce new locators in the locator set of a | > Shim6 context, preventing redirection attacks [RFC4218]. | | --> In particular, the use of HBA/CGA prevents on-path and | off-path attackers injecting new locators into the locator set of a | Shim6 context, thus preventing redirection attacks [RFC4218]. Made all these changes, thanks again | | == Outdated reference: A later version (-02) exists of | draft-nordmark-shim6-esd-01 Umm. I have a problem with this. I had already noticed that the 'nits' shown by the IETF tools show == Outdated reference: A later version (-02) exists of draft-nordmark-shim6-esd-01 However, when I look for the -02 document, I cannot find it. For example, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nordmark-shim6-esd/ refers to version -01 In tools.ietf.org, only -01 is available (http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nordmark-shim6-esd-01.txt - if 02 is tried, it is redirected to 01) Google cannot find the document for me, too. So, it is not clear to me whether I should use 01 or 02 in the citation. Regards, Alberto | | _______________________________________________ | shim6 mailing list | shim6@ietf.org | https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6
- [shim6] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-shim6-… Geoff Huston
- Re: [shim6] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-sh… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [shim6] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-sh… Alberto García
- Re: [shim6] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-sh… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [shim6] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-sh… Geoff Huston