Re: [shim6] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-shim6-multihome-shim-api

Geoff Huston <> Fri, 09 July 2010 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5868E3A698C for <>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.077
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.528, BAYES_00=-2.599, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DsAMAeRA9XRp for <>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:dc0:2001:11::199]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948B03A69A9 for <>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A514D58BD; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:32:11 +1000 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Geoff Huston <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:32:06 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Subject: Re: [shim6] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-shim6-multihome-shim-api
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SHIM6 Working Group Mailing List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:32:24 -0000

On 23/06/2010, at 4:05 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:

> My apologies for the delay in issuing this.
> The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from the authors of draft-ietf-shim6-multihome-shim-api-13.txt. The intended status of this document is Informational. The document (and the draft history) is at
> The 2 week WG Last Call will end as of the close of business on Tuesday 7th July 2010.
> As usual, please address all comments to the SHIM6 WG mailing list, and please be clear in your comments to this WG last call if you are supporting the document's submission to the IESG or if you are opposed, or if you are not expressing a view either way. 
> Thanks,

Given that this is the 2nd time around in WG Last Call I believe that we are now done with this document and its time for it to head to the IESG.