[shim6] Exit selection [New Version Notification - draft-mrw-nat66-08.txt]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 08 March 2011 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: shim6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shim6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0923A6959 for <shim6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:54:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id baa6rdgR10TF for <shim6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE703A6814 for <shim6@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:54:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so5940475fxm.31 for <shim6@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:56:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KepZ1mKUvro42fHex4EF00XlMgPbRoN4okj28YOJedg=; b=nWhCOpFM6r++YKx2KxRyxYexKrlESS85O6yZ+13zolU8ZYSlxds8EL7FQiN/jzxfKb +IQtMisL1oEftx8zMajn2Cbaw1JEEJRE8WRDyIDd/mhpk3LXqfBSOwcEoTz5l1O1HN40 Z3xep0wDCLx9RRZD3GGL+lKgfBxdg/Qh/47ng=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hylVX4ieMimrKG0ptnnI66zIimridtsSjkCkpjn0w6wX0GLvHKxhKYfc7KseyrLgqe r1uGZkIaTJyNLGcf/sItxwRWUySvrUeInCXBHEePdK209RWLlKqE+SUtgdkmRQ4ZEseZ OWLF9S3xex1HXPRHLsI6nAk0YwG2zD6Os82tM=
Received: by with SMTP id h18mr4334700fas.46.1299614167481; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] (202-180-96-58.callplus.net.nz []) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j11sm536247faa.20.2011. (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D7689CC.7060409@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:55:56 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?UsOpbWkgRGVzcHLDqXM=?= <remi.despres@free.fr>
References: <20110228223003.13022.10464.idtracker@localhost> <845A4F08-46E7-48EE-B294-0C8368BAD1CB@cisco.com> <20110302072822.GA20321@serpens.de> <5AC61190-49B0-49B5-ACB1-1FA5082C0380@cisco.com> <20110302203006.GI23030@serpens.de> <4D6EB08E.9000109@gmail.com> <20110302214913.GG20321@serpens.de> <4D6EC293.90608@gmail.com> <20110303065132.GH20321@serpens.de> <4D6FF098.6010600@gmail.com> <A3C0405F-F5E1-4911-A67B-CB3FCD153B29@free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <A3C0405F-F5E1-4911-A67B-CB3FCD153B29@free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: shim6-wg <shim6@ietf.org>, "S.P.Zeidler" <spz@serpens.de>
Subject: [shim6] Exit selection [New Version Notification - draft-mrw-nat66-08.txt]
X-BeenThere: shim6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SHIM6 Working Group Mailing List <shim6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shim6>
List-Post: <mailto:shim6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:54:53 -0000

Diverted from the v6ops list:

On 2011-03-09 06:22, Rémi Després wrote:
> Le 3 mars 2011 à 20:48, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
>> ...
>> Of course. PI has the cost of exploding the BGP4 table.
>> NPTv6 has the cost of destroying address transparency.
>> Since SHIM6 has neither of these costs, are you surprised
>> that I prefer it?
> SHIM6 is a solution, but AFAIK it needs that hosts know:
> - their global addresses
> - means to force outgoing paths that go via the right CPE's (an ingress-filtering constraint) 

This is well understood to be an issue for shim6.

How about rechartering the WG to resolve this?

The tail end of the charter says:

 Dec 2010  	Submit implementation report to IESG for publication as Informational RFC
 Dec 2010 	Submit applicability document to IESG for publication as Informational RFC
 Dec 2010 	Close or re-charter

Where is the implementation report, BTW? And when will the applicability
draft be ready for the IESG?


> In a site using ULAs and having several links, a complement is therefore needed. 
> SAM is an approach for this (ref. draft-despres-softwire-sam-01 - sec. 3.3), and AFAIK the only documented one so far.
> Would you agree on this?
> RD