Re: [Shutup] Proposed Charter for something

Stephen Farrell <> Mon, 07 December 2015 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF691A1BCB; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 02:50:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3KNYwDLxU5ku; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 02:50:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D54F41A1B7B; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 02:50:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9F4BE33; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:50:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jEX96P-LVoXG; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:50:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [] ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FD81BDCF; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:50:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=mail; t=1449485444; bh=8efiUTxUa+PTBFJKP9Sdh4oKV5Ke0QrdsYwLR0obM68=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=eoEBNabTZJ1SxccE5kRYbHx51caChPcWd9UvxCVVvLHhw8tR4PB67z416GkgAHGp1 VxDn004ROf8AYXAzrsmkv99xj85oGb3QvGZs4JRKhgkdb4Giv1pjMhESGAKcpvd9hi kdNTSA7Zx6A+71ubMg8b8wyOOdhZ2ljGo+86g+o8=
To: John Levine <>,,
References: <20151207023426.54934.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Stephen Farrell <>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:50:42 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151207023426.54934.qmail@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Shutup] Proposed Charter for something
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMTP Headers Unhealthy To User Privacy <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 10:50:47 -0000

On 07/12/15 02:34, John Levine wrote:
> This is increasingly looking like a RG, not a WG.

Hmm, not sure. A good RG is one that'd attract an active
research community and be relatively long lived whereas
this seems like a bit of work where we need to do a relatively
small and discrete amount of research on one topic. (Which
is roughly "What'd happen if you mucked with received headers
the MSA passes on to the rest of the mail infrastructure?")

The way I think of it is a good RG would produce a stream
of academic publications and then some stuff that'd be of
use to the IETF. This sounds more like one paper's worth
of research then stuff would be done in the IETF or not,
depending on the findings.

So I don't think an RG would be a good plan and a WG
can be chartered to investigate things before proposing

But if folks think an RG is better, the first step would be
to talk to Lars about it.