Re: [Shutup] [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for the "SMTP Headers Unhealthy To User Privacy" WG (fwd)

"MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <> Wed, 02 December 2015 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0109D1ACDEB; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:23:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.191
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.191 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TY_79EVCkIaw; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:23:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BFE11ACDF4; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([fe80::f5de:4c30:bc26:d70a]) by ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:23:21 -0500
From: "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <>
To: "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [ietf-smtp] [Shutup] Proposed Charter for the "SMTP Headers Unhealthy To User Privacy" WG (fwd)
Thread-Index: AQHRLSh6QEC/jQ62IUCw/aN1tJvJXJ64UMAA//+xS8A=
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 18:23:20 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <20151202174004.23134.qmail@ary.lan> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
x-kse-attachmentfiltering-interceptor-info: protection disabled
x-kse-serverinfo:, 9
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean, bases: 12/2/2015 5:19:00 PM
x-kse-dlp-scaninfo: Skipped
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 08:14:58 -0800
Subject: Re: [Shutup] [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for the "SMTP Headers Unhealthy To User Privacy" WG (fwd)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMTP Headers Unhealthy To User Privacy <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 18:23:33 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-smtp [] On Behalf Of Ted
> Lemon
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 1:03 PM
> To:
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] [Shutup] Proposed Charter for the "SMTP Headers
> Unhealthy To User Privacy" WG (fwd)
> Wednesday, Dec 2, 2015 12:40 PM John Levine wrote:
> > You can kind of tell where I am from my mail headers, but since my
> > name and address and phone number are in the phone book, it's hard to
> > imagine what the damage would be.
> The damage is that there are quite a few John Levines in the world.   If you
> say something that triggers someone's desire to harass you, they will be able
> to use your IP address to determine that it is the John Levine who lives in
> Trumansburg who offended them, and then they can just google "John
> Levine Trumansburg" to dox or swat you.   This is _precisely_ the problem
> with revealing your IP address.   It took me about ten minutes to get your
> home address, and that's because I don't have any practice.   Without the IP
> address, I would have had no chance of figuring out _which_ John Levine to
> target with my notional swatting or pizza delivery.  It would have taken <1
> minute to find your street address except that you did a good job of chaffing
> by using a P.O. Box.

It took me 20 seconds using google and no IP Addresses were harmed in the testing - BTW John, congratulations on your page ranking. 

I've refrained from getting into this conversation but increasingly my sense is that Ted has a solution that is seeking a problem.