Re: [Shutup] [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for the "SMTP Headers Unhealthy To User Privacy" WG (fwd)

Al Iverson <aiverson@spamresource.com> Tue, 01 December 2015 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <aiverson@spamresource.com>
X-Original-To: shutup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shutup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E4B1B2ACC for <shutup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:52:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s99BUcW84sBo for <shutup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:52:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com (mail-ig0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A232B1B29C7 for <shutup@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:52:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igvg19 with SMTP id g19so106493154igv.1 for <shutup@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:52:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spamresource.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HaE2B1cCWuYgjgbYOhB/zzts5CmAU+amrMsbm7TkQ9g=; b=a7MLZ6F5L2Khtcd53HSeLc/5vhpLeL/h03m7mBA/Qm7zaq0JENAnlrkK3rcsNfxKQP A5bo92xW4Avp6g3JkkZ1/r55lQ4Sot4DwR2yIi0AtQ3Io/2ikGE1iqSFiWjtaLqEFJ7m L1DgMfKsNzs0HZZUHSnWmmy6t7EPoKZ2IaqcM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HaE2B1cCWuYgjgbYOhB/zzts5CmAU+amrMsbm7TkQ9g=; b=Aj9wfddSo+4hmH5t9k0UMOsQz+zTHSUudOpd95LJbruyRqOGTByfz701iVmw1Tufa9 9xRZ0UNxerw9ZjnnOkr9/Eno8IxFowoAuFBj4AVxi830LOc9N3U1ohGCQbeT6hqvCj8Z Y7nJkGmhIz1rrVZQt7JOuiVRYCQ7qjUZDI7KzTwvZgPJ22rl02oBDfiUpuXTF3JpiAg7 VDu0/AzA7+4XuskXHjpyuSmulI5oNW9Cp/DH5MmkF76/KPGjZsx1jDc/5sXmC+Y8K5Bv YmLI1gna7KSKGmIu4L4xsKCI8Smxo/E/+6phQJTA1DMtg/x6FXSeZUPM1sX+UoEmpqmD PD/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQklMLWuW3IprJa6tTYrZt6DoDXtSdH42Zuy66/STOfxitj8PKEdGeRxWLzjPVfUpX5MTSFa
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.199 with SMTP id y7mr24705249igl.47.1449013962069; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:52:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.184.68 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:52:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1449013554783-b461d703-192d4623-50f6eda5@fugue.com>
References: <20151130042819.10658.qmail@ary.lan> <1448858775386-ceecd236-8b11ac04-a03b4438@fugue.com> <01PTPUIP3IUK01729W@mauve.mrochek.com> <11d014e5-9a6a-4b78-92a1-8e0a1e0a905d@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <lGTaHvC8ygXWFAuu@highwayman.com> <1449005349724-ffd73ebb-f70e368e-426663a1@fugue.com> <565E2926.1050900@mustelids.ca> <1449013554783-b461d703-192d4623-50f6eda5@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:52:41 -0600
Message-ID: <CAGGEJxb26SSVepbfrG3Yo6RUHzvROfuhvh0iCsW2ki7KUPMc=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Al Iverson <aiverson@spamresource.com>
To: shutup@ietf.org, ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/shutup/INauxBP486kUkZ6-h5NytuMwwN4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 08:14:58 -0800
Subject: Re: [Shutup] [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for the "SMTP Headers Unhealthy To User Privacy" WG (fwd)
X-BeenThere: shutup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMTP Headers Unhealthy To User Privacy <shutup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/shutup>, <mailto:shutup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/shutup/>
List-Post: <mailto:shutup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shutup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shutup>, <mailto:shutup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 23:52:44 -0000

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> Tuesday, Dec 1, 2015 6:11 PM Chris Lewis wrote:
>> When your cat's litter box gets infected with, say, cutwail, spewing gazillions of copies of randomized "come do X to my Y!" exhortations, you're not giving the receiver (ML or ad-hoc) very much to distinguish between that and your pearls of wisdom.
>
> Er, no, the cat box doesn't have my credentials nor know my email address, so it can't send spam from me.   If it sends spam from someone other than me, the Received header field makes my /legitimate/ email look more like spam, because both the cat's spam and my legitimate email have the same IP address in the Received header field.

Is that a hobbyist configuration? Is it relevant? It sounds a bit like
a cat and the hat both sharing a NAT. But in a very common high volume
production email scenario used by email service providers, clients and
types of mail are segregated by sending IP address.

>  In this case I /definitely/ don't want the Received header field.

Noted that you don't. Just adding my voice: I do want it.

Regards,
Al Iverson

--
Al Iverson - Minneapolis - (312) 275-0130
Simple DNS Tools since 2008: xnnd.com
www.spamresource.com & aliverson.com