Re: [sidr] adopt a mib

Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Fri, 05 August 2011 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BB321F8B80 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.579, BAYES_20=-0.74, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dMWy7MXwigWF for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm24.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm24.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 401E421F8B7C for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.91.67] by nm24.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2011 13:04:58 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.42] by tm7.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2011 13:04:58 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1042.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2011 13:04:58 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 871089.86560.bm@omp1042.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 79385 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2011 13:04:58 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1312549498; bh=2gy9cffz0iSnOy4yjFDk47SiXCBiTYQmvgHg10m/jyY=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=F7tgB3hMyjuwFZLgCOioJ0/QGJv+PhiFqerDw4VQ1mPEClpLHaRGeTfKSeiI86SyPKcDLyEipcTJfK+cKW7xPTXbqyVDUVgFVRuHLzuEAJ5rACT9bb95n4TShsOKQ4xSrZNriprlNbujIs77vqIjrSojBIkQAQOFpfLyqrvqZwk=
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: f8XOlmMVM1k69XqI10su0v1xcZs2NiURs6EP_FvwjRF36zh iaDvcJ3jIeAMcoh_GzCYNN54MRBZ0XcdRH8MPdl6s9SypR1DSVN8TowVmvuc qLhKIyE2SgDEVJjL_gspms94H0VrMfdavqcQdloajmRUjNhWicEzZ2gjqVC9 F8AVR1dThRxrDNlz9BuTIE_DcdEeLEWs22wPOmxxszPE89KW5mLapQ_bOp9v ZW8Muz.lbnlRYHnFFHSsstPdNxji49pGqEkvsLDwwbeSKFT9LgWUbJKR2hMJ d9PsDCO0lRLgUOV9cxfh30AytKWqvAIcpqgX_.x0HlCf62V4yCQ2UBO7.TXQ 7QLT5lbA3ezGa8_5JNkwffnCaunNGDD7j6yYYCH.pNvoRdGUOS6IiL3Ud2hx KHfKlFP_Fi_fbXvvh_nKZ6TH4yoQM7OpazvSs.Q--
X-Yahoo-SMTP: ZrP3VLSswBDL75pF8ymZHDSu9B.vcMfDPgLJ
Received: from thunderfish.westell.com (turners@96.231.115.219 with plain) by smtp113.biz.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 05 Aug 2011 06:04:58 -0700 PDT
Message-ID: <4E3BEA79.1050103@ieca.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:04:57 -0400
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
References: <m2d3gkepg8.wl%randy@psg.com> <C0E26DF8-49F5-4B3D-9A4F-73068ED913CD@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C0E26DF8-49F5-4B3D-9A4F-73068ED913CD@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [sidr] adopt a mib
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:04:41 -0000

I support both too.

spt

On 8/4/11 7:38 PM, Roque Gagliano wrote:
> I support adoption of both documents with one comment:
> On "draft-ymbk-bgp-origin-validation-mib", I would not use the word "ROATable". The router does not interact with ROAs and I believe it is confusing.
> In  "draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-02", the same table is referred as: "pfx_validate_table".
>
> Roque
>
>
>
>> i would request the wg adopt
>>
>>     draft-ymbk-bgp-origin-validation-mib
>>     draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib
>>
>> yes, they are works in progress.  but that's what a wg is for.
>>
>> fwiw, bert is hacking away.  expect fuller work in a week.
>>
>> randy
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> sidr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr