IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Slides for "RPKI Over BitTorrent" presentation

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Fri, 30 March 2012 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8346721F869F for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RHUcG0GbvqjU for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6F821F869C for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-1390.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-1390.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.19.144]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id F033D308492; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:24:28 -0300 (UYT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_36FA7C5E-D645-4BE6-B30A-4AE3A652B2AD"
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120329100434.BBE5A6EE29F@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:24:25 +0200
Message-Id: <1DC0A868-0B15-448E-93E6-C61CC89AB6A6@lacnic.net>
References: <20120326173305.D1CB96E71B3@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <A76204B3-5EF3-4212-9136-B8E3266C7D17@tcb.net> <20120329100434.BBE5A6EE29F@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
To: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Slides for "RPKI Over BitTorrent" presentation
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:24:37 -0000

Rob,

	I think it is a bit premature to conclude that. Under the same data set I could conclude that your network, validator and research methodology is broken. But that is not the point, the point is that we may have a problem, let's try to solve it and to validate how bad it is.

	In another email Chris Morrow suggested to measure using different validator implementation and different locations, which I think it is a very good idea to see how bad we are and how we can improve.

	Meanwhile, as an repository operator I would love to hear your suggestion to improve. 

Cheers,
/as

On 29 Mar 2012, at 12:04, Rob Austein wrote:

>  In my opinion the RIRs are currently using
> rsync badly, given the way they've chosen to set up their
> repositories.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email