IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz

Heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Thu, 08 September 2016 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304E412B2A4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FcC-VDOR0tcQ for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9440C12B2EF for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.58.5.42] (unknown [198.58.5.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6573C78A85; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 13:32:31 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G36)
In-Reply-To: <m237lax2g7.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 06:32:31 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3F99CEBE-90B9-46F9-92CE-3E773933A760@shrubbery.net>
References: <yj9ooa46aumt.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <AAE3F119-98A3-4618-BBFB-76F921316BD1@gmail.com> <349cb6ac-f4fe-29e5-b01f-3223b14e47de@gmail.com> <m2shteszs3.wl-randy@psg.com> <0a66024b-5cae-1abb-dc53-b11c1e35cdeb@bbn.com> <20160906220000.F1005420823A@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <CAL9jLaYLJ2_1Dj9BtpQBa+Ta+BrGdvNpHHfFgrRxQ6SVo-6RXw@mail.gmail.com> <20160907040720.769594208DBB@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <CAL9jLabwQQzigJF1=36dY7uWVcHSBKBmRC8DLd4pv1F1i0PZJg@mail.gmail.com> <BBA42462-C8AF-4C78-973B-3C475A9970D6@ripe.net> <CAL9jLaZ5tPtg0D1gWvURv=CXRdzWud5C+FWv4WUHeW6v2BLzvw@mail.gmail.com> <m237lax2g7.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/15j8GZEnl8K2XZ1CHJ42x9RnFXk>
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 13:35:51 -0000


Am 08.09.2016 um 00:42 schrieb Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>:

>> Or maybe there's pushback that says: "Hey, I hear what you all in the
>> rir want, but it's not cool, please please let's dive back into the
>> politics stream and see how we get movement on what we all (probably?)
>> want: a single root for this system."

Or can the RIRs be removed from the equation? Why must we care what the RiRs want (fitting of many questions surrounding the RIRs)? Theyre essentially just agents of the IANA, its not inconceivable to replace them or separate duties. 

> 
> the iab did that and got a written agreement that the rirs would do so.
> nothing more is needed other than action.
> 
> randy


> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status