Subject: Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz
From: Heasley <[email-masked]>
To: Randy Bush <[email-masked]>
Cc: sidr wg list <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:32:31 -0700
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>

Am 08.09.2016 um 00:42 schrieb Randy Bush <[email-masked]>:

>> Or maybe there's pushback that says: "Hey, I hear what you all in the
>> rir want, but it's not cool, please please let's dive back into the
>> politics stream and see how we get movement on what we all (probably?)
>> want: a single root for this system."

Or can the RIRs be removed from the equation? Why must we care what the RiRs want (fitting of many questions surrounding the RIRs)? Theyre essentially just agents of the IANA, its not inconceivable to replace them or separate duties. 

> 
> the iab did that and got a written agreement that the rirs would do so.
> nothing more is needed other than action.
> 
> randy

> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr