IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] agenda for virtual meeting Mar 24

Eric Osterweil <eosterweil@verisign.com> Mon, 19 March 2012 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <eosterweil@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DCA21F8838 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.088, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id okiNDRdM-BWG for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og108.obsmtp.com (exprod6og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EEB21F884F for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob108.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT2dS6/+rKV6dcq6IYRk3UN1QdsbiZ2v9@postini.com; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:38:23 PDT
Received: from dul1wnexcn03.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (dul1wnexcn03.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.170.12.113]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q2JFcHhO021390; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:38:17 -0400
Received: from dul1eosterwe-m1.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.88.30.33]) by dul1wnexcn03.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:38:16 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Eric Osterweil <eosterweil@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <2B8DCAA7-F1D0-48D5-9AE1-E417883D4A60@ripe.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:38:19 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <276F1ADB-69D0-478C-B0A6-428658B6D354@verisign.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60F6C84EF@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD465693779173C924FB7@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com> <2B8DCAA7-F1D0-48D5-9AE1-E417883D4A60@ripe.net>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2012 15:38:16.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[4DBEF6B0:01CD05E6]
Cc: Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>, "sidr@ietf.org list" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] agenda for virtual meeting Mar 24
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:38:24 -0000

On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote:

> Hi WG, and Sandy as co-chair,
> 
> On 19 Mar 2012, at 15:11, George, Wes wrote:
> 
>> Was the WG consulted on scheduling this virtual meeting and I missed the message?
> 
> +1... I may have missed something, but I don't remember this... In any case I can not attend, not even remotely, Saturday.

+1 from me too.  I would happily have commented that I (and likely others) were on flights at that time if there had been some kind of an open call.

> 
> Is there no option to have this meeting during the IETF so that more people can attend?
> Yes, I understand that this will result in other collisions...

+1

> 
> So if it can't be helped this time, +1 on the doodle poll for future events as well..

+1 Maybe we should just presume that there can be a SIDR meeting on each of our flights too?  We can use the same agenda and just merge the results?  Should be easy, right? ;)

Eric

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status