IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] On 0/0 at the 5 TAs - Some comments on the motivations

Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> Thu, 08 September 2016 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <sra@hactrn.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2038C12B333 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dDDeo929Ew_t for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from khatovar.hactrn.net (khatovar.hactrn.net [198.180.150.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BC0312B2D9 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from minas-ithil.hactrn.net (c-73-47-197-23.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [73.47.197.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "nargothrond.hactrn.net", Issuer "Grunchweather Associates" (not verified)) by khatovar.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93CAA13992 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:39:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from minas-ithil.hactrn.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minas-ithil.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CA0420E4D8 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:37:01 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 11:37:01 -0400
From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
To: sidr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <85DF97DE-0EFD-4002-8EDE-83C3B6CB8E8F@gmail.com>
References: <85DF97DE-0EFD-4002-8EDE-83C3B6CB8E8F@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20160908153701.F0CA0420E4D8@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/1l8LfNOznIVpr2ojMK6rL2I05GY>
Subject: Re: [sidr] On 0/0 at the 5 TAs - Some comments on the motivations
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:43:44 -0000

Hi, Carlos.  Technical question:

Do the current RIR CA implementations support the client role of the
"up-down" provisioning protocol, and, if so, has there been any recent
interop testing of this, either against other RIR CA implementations
or against mine?

APNIC's original implementation did support it.  I think RIPE's
implementation sort of supported it at one point but they did not
consider it production-ready.  Dunno about the others, and all of this
was a while ago, haven't heard much about it recently.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email