IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 27 September 2011 23:53 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0311021F8EE1; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.401, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MkFV5EgvlmAu; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C8021F8EDC; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8RNtTlF008883 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E826271.9020700@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:55:29 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimq3hcdK7-f_Pa9sWJJOTzF_GBLcYu36sB3WszN@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaaVbmExEM2ZwBf5Ur6aRbBayxX13xGBL27r-svOmC3Wvg@mail.gmail.com> <001801cc60bb$19329d00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4E527D5B.2080104@isi.edu> <003f01cc626f$4d2d2d40$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4E554ECC.3020408@isi.edu> <F350099E-1EEA-4478-BFC2-72A4622012E5@vpnc.org> <4E5570EF.4020202@isi.edu> <6E68CE6B-920E-4A4C-AEB4-1E775C702284@vpnc.org> <4E55925A.90309@isi.edu> <CAL9jLaasfBXB531wpANhCNXfedSaOi3FO-BJEEN0ggnkS=3D9A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaasfBXB531wpANhCNXfedSaOi3FO-BJEEN0ggnkS=3D9A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: sidr-chairs@ietf.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:53:20 -0000

Hi, Christopher (et al.),

On 9/26/2011 6:44 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Joe Touch<touch@isi.edu>  wrote:
...
> The doc in question hit version 16 on 8/13/2011... I think the authors
> feel that the problems/issues/discussion-points here are addressed in
> this version. Are we cycled down to acceptance of the language or no?
> The -16 version asks for a 'well-known' port, which gets to the main
> point of this discussion I think.

I would expect that it would NOT be a 'well-known' port, but a 
'registered' port, given that security is optional.

If security is required - just in a variety of forms - then I would 
expect that the text would need to be reworded.

> (and an IANA request would still need to be made when the doc goes
> toward publishing)

That happens automatically as part of the processing of the IANA 
Considerations section, FWIW.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email