Re: [sidr] Alexey Melnikov's Yes on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: (with COMMENT)

"Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> Thu, 12 January 2017 04:17 UTC

Return-Path: <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451AC129412; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:17:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qGULk1UR2Yts; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gcc01-dm2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm2gcc01on0093.outbound.protection.outlook.com [23.103.201.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D824B12941E; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:17:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nist-gov; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Rce9/xPsEIUe2HaZqGleg8DB23x9RYb+ehGG+tjjClI=; b=hEIzyuFUUlnTdMLPlnNItuHG9jvuQ9JVj91SE5xWtWRDjX3qiYqQQ55OQDQMPgbT8XotaTWamRX0eVj89qL5Py9nodmblRL0kgp5jHzfonWbR+wLBXJKrQ4EZKS8D6qGEA9KU9XlCotyMiWHa/1Zp12ODlCNP3Sjo1TvJH6xULA=
Received: from DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.161.252.145) by DM2PR09MB0445.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.161.252.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.817.10; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:17:07 +0000
Received: from DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.252.145]) by DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.252.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0817.020; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:17:07 +0000
From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] Alexey Melnikov's Yes on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSZnD5Ie/2p3jeMkeIgv1icHTisKEpp0IAgAoaqKCAACcIAIAAWS6AgAAEFYQ=
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:17:07 +0000
Message-ID: <DM2PR09MB04464D301A9F4E2929939E3884790@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <148352385243.12916.15407627777806532255.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2vatvkug0.wl-randy@psg.com> <64ABB874-A355-4F91-93D6-6671CB6A354C@sn3rd.com> <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF6440DC8C3@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <309117C0-FA5E-412A-B19B-F2C86B2DA02B@fastmail.fm> <DM2PR09MB04465394949EA3F934F2D5DD84660@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <A6D95FEC-CDDE-49FA-BAC7-429821A3CDE0@fastmail.fm>, <8C8177C2-1ED6-4BB8-BD5A-F15C8B0559D5@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C8177C2-1ED6-4BB8-BD5A-F15C8B0559D5@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov;
x-originating-ip: [129.6.219.101]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9316876e-21fa-4bb5-8570-08d43aa1df10
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:DM2PR09MB0445;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR09MB0445; 7:P+W3vc2Yg3gJ9fnu0ea02+NS8hBC3VuaJm2M5TgLaiaXo9v6xwaay5NfKOeOHMOxII5bg9PYF7gZMHyyNTReMBy8FSTkOSMP/q1nybSmbs81AAD5ypOGrZtO+CjLaY/fzJ1PbXV0IXWaVr23RW9Da5hSR3X/JdgB+7MWCLoCNJes/LmcTGCdBmyxn6PKTxYwH2DD88Wv6Ob/RDGtSKn16ZvNSu3DuHWQRXuUljGeoVRa1l0L7p3RUIotaHxxPrGtQb9emFOdu5Tlx5TwZYBRvI3dS+Ajn3I/7ir5D78pP7J9BH32TS2GeJ2lXvzRTdPz6ALLEltOV1E6f/4rdP7OFWZAzbQyBvzmoMAKsDbMdUJN302AQLz/PUTD4CWtEhWNOUOaBE5YKDJ8pTrv5H94dRXJaLGnMbt9cxUdXetSlnY/VHkWEuujK4wtMsBcJWgRTWilukORkp9pM1CXqSJXgg==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR09MB044545AA3F002A1036B94C3F84790@DM2PR09MB0445.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(37575265505322)(65766998875637)(1591387915157);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:DM2PR09MB0445; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0445;
x-forefront-prvs: 018577E36E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39410400002)(39840400002)(39850400002)(39450400003)(39860400002)(189002)(51914003)(24454002)(51444003)(199003)(377454003)(54906002)(229853002)(86362001)(106116001)(77096006)(7696004)(6306002)(99286003)(101416001)(74316002)(2906002)(106356001)(2950100002)(105586002)(54356999)(3846002)(92566002)(55016002)(9686003)(6506006)(6436002)(6116002)(102836003)(25786008)(2900100001)(38730400001)(4326007)(5660300001)(345774005)(97736004)(68736007)(3280700002)(50986999)(76176999)(3660700001)(189998001)(33656002)(7736002)(122556002)(81156014)(230783001)(8936002)(81166006)(3900700001)(93886004)(5001770100001)(8676002)(8666007)(305945005)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0445; H:DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Jan 2017 04:17:07.1149 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR09MB0445
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/38Zc3JhgceuZoX5jdCj1Jq-LbrA>
Cc: "draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol@ietf.org>, sidr chairs <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>, "m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de" <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Alexey Melnikov's Yes on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:17:13 -0000

Hi Suresh,

Thank you for this suggestion as well:

>* Section 2.1

>The IANA registry at

>http://www.iana.org/assignments/address-family-numbers/address-family-numbers.xhtml

>may be a better reference for AFIs than RFC4760.

It has been incorporated in my editor copy of version 22 (to be uploaded in a couple of days).

Sriram 



________________________________________
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 10:53 PM
To: Alexey Melnikov
Cc: Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed); sidr wg list; Sean Turner; sidr chairs; draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol@ietf.org; The IESG; m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de
Subject: Re: [sidr] Alexey Melnikov's Yes on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: (with COMMENT)

On Jan 11, 2017, at 5:34 PM, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm<mailto:aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>> wrote:

Hi Sriram,

On 11 Jan 2017, at 20:17, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov<mailto:kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>> wrote:

Hi Alexey,

My comment in line below.

From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:aamelnikov@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 4:57 AM)

On 5 Jan 2017, at 03:19, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com<mailto:suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>> wrote:

On 01/04/2017 09:38 AM, Sean Turner wrote:

On Jan 4, 2017, at 05:09, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com<mailto:randy@psg.com>> wrote:

+1 to the comment from Suresh about order. I though that something
+like
what he proposed will minimize memcopies and possibly use of memory
why hashing. So I am also curious to know answer to his question.

a vendor engineer actually implementing requested the change to the
current syntax for ease of generating/parsing.

randy

I believe this is that thread that resulted in the final organization:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/8B_e4CNxQCUKeZ_AUzsdnn2f5M
U

Thanks for the pointer Sean. Very interesting.

Indeed! I wish a few words about design could be added to the draft.

The design explanation would be a bit long as you can see from
Oliver's (implementer's) post.
There is a BGPsec design discussion document (to be published
as an independent submission RFC):

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sriram-bgpsec-design-choices-11

I think that would be better place to include this design rationale as well.

Works for me.

FWIW, Works for me as well.

Regards
Suresh