Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 04 January 2017 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2D8129558; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 04:49:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kJ5_zWy4ErWJ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 04:49:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97D4612954B; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 04:49:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6398; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1483534185; x=1484743785; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=PU+ExoiGzPezSPvzM3wQ04qUD757um6QzFL90Coo+LQ=; b=EyxH5uXkeGJSupR6aS9PIDGnpes1yxKEf0qnWPBWp2biU4doaBVNXTHI 3WbLCKL+VZgTbi3icKRG/McDdDh2hjuABjpjv3h87Dya9r1yoAElOPj9T Oa1mytQNbVnQIHQ2P0o306crtDfUiKSMVs8TXm+C2glUx0KqPBVVHkGei o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BLAQAp7mxY/5NdJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgnFHAQEBAQEfX4EMB41QpD+DGoIPggiGIgIagTI/FAECAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAWMohGkGI1YQAgEIQgICAjAlAgQBDQWIcK8ZgiUrigoBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEdhkWCAgiCV4dLLYIxBZUShXcBkUCQWZI/AR84gSs8AYQOgUZyhyW?= =?us-ascii?q?BDQEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,459,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="193115261"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jan 2017 12:49:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v04Cniwm016328 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:49:44 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 06:49:43 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 06:49:43 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Thread-Topic: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSZh1mV02ZKEidTEacSYlhmNd4h6En9OyAgABhpQA=
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:49:43 +0000
Message-ID: <F170405A-7984-4A15-B2E7-99E2BE0682C4@cisco.com>
References: <148348795694.28027.8646303758093237302.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2d1g3mvo2.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2d1g3mvo2.wl-randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1d.0.161209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F170405A79844A15B2E799E2BE0682C4ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/3YmtHqBOh-zA_pc9qUT_pyJorP0>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:49:47 -0000

On 1/3/17, 9:00 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:



| | -12.2: [I-D.ietf.sider.bgpsec.overview] is mentioned in section 2 as

| | needed to understand this document. That suggests it should be a

| | normative reference.

|

| ennie meenie.  i think some other reviewer had me push refs around.  i

| don't have a dog in this fight.  my personal opinion would be that

| overview is informative and the protocol spec itself is normative.



I agree.  In fact, it was me who asked to move I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview to Informative as the reference to the spec (draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol) is the Normative one.



In this case, we don’t want to make I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview a Normative reference because it is an Informational document and would result in a downref (resulting in more process, and that document is not ready yet).



Alvaro.