IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions-00

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 01 July 2016 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B076712B022 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5f82iIaLf45 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9325512B00F for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1bJ75r-0003RG-C4; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 22:39:27 +0000
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 07:39:25 +0900
Message-ID: <m28txldluq.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <8196148a-b98d-c680-c714-55498131e7ce@bbn.com>
References: <8E32FD39-FD20-455C-8BEC-5752DE9C8531@tislabs.com> <m2wpl6ffdp.wl%randy@psg.com> <8196148a-b98d-c680-c714-55498131e7ce@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/4Uk2CWkU-nqz9WfLuKKwHG4GUXw>
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions-00
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 22:39:30 -0000

> I'll revise that text to note the case of a resource transfer appears to 
> be competition

it is more than transfer.  it is the very frequent operation of changing
tranist providers.  i own P, but do not use bgp.  my parent T0 announces
it for me (roa P-T0).  i change upstream providers to T1.  during the
move there are two roas, the second being P-T1.

this all was very intentionally designed for make before break.
multiple roas with different ASs for the same prefix are normal.  i
found it shocking and disappointing to have the introduction say
otherwise.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email