Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 04 January 2017 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EDF1299D3; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 08:54:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hkPf1l5q4BHt; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 08:54:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF28A12965F; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 08:54:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1cOopO-0002RR-8A; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 16:54:18 +0000
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 01:54:15 +0900
Message-ID: <m2fukylqa0.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <41B2F724-8213-469E-836D-46650503B403@nostrum.com>
References: <148348795694.28027.8646303758093237302.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2d1g3mvo2.wl-randy@psg.com> <F170405A-7984-4A15-B2E7-99E2BE0682C4@cisco.com> <41B2F724-8213-469E-836D-46650503B403@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/4o6BM-4lbrBQm9sNZSWa03YnjNA>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 16:54:25 -0000

> The issue I saw is that section 2 says readers are expected to
> understand bgpsec, and cites the overview for that purpose. Perhaps it
> should cite the protocol doc for the "expected to understand" part

ok.  done.  i would be happier if that document was easier to read and
more concise.

i just pushed

randy