Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz

[Chris Morrow <[e-mail]>]

At Mon, 5 Sep 2016 19:54:53 -0300,
"Carlos M. Martinez" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Here is the pointer to the document:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rir-rpki-allres-ta-app-statement-01
> 
> Apologies for my earlier laziness.

no worries, yes Sandy and I chatted about this... err, I think the end
 result was: "is this an ops thing? should this go to ops? or should
 we just adopt it in SIDR and jam it through?"

I think sandy was due to send 'authors'(you/andy/etc) a mail about
this... oh and we're waiting on Alvaro to reply to this as well.

I'll mail an update to the list.

> 
> On 9/5/2016 3:32 PM, Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> > 
> > I know we already discussed this over private email, but perhaps you can
> > comment on the list on the future of the requested WG adoption call for
> > the ‘all resources’ applicability statement draft.
> > 
> > thanks!
> > 
> > -Carlos
> > 
> > On 2 Sep 2016, at 17:56, Chris Morrow wrote:
> > 
> >>
> >> Howdy SIDR peeps,
> >> (+bonus ops ad)
> >>
> >> Following on the Berlin meeting we were trying to accomplish two
> >> things:
> >>
> >>   1) get all documents related to sidr protocols into wglc and then
> >>   publication
> >>
> >>   2) get all documents which are more operationally focused moved
> >>   along to an ops group (sidr-ops or something akin to that)
> >>
> >> With that in mind there are 8 documents in the publication queue:
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis
> >>
> >> and 11 still in progress. Of the 11 left Sandy and I think they
> >> roughly break down like:
> >>
> >> Documents which should move to the ops group:
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light - authors notified/queried
> >> about this
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying
> >>
> >> documents which should finish out in sidr:
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-publication
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup - pub request in flight
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-slurm - authors recently updated
> >>   draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions - wglc imminent
> >>
> >> I think if there's no meaningful discussion on change for these
> >> between now and 9/16/2016 (Sept 16th) we will assume this list is
> >> correct. For documents in the 'move' list, if progress to publication
> >> happens 'good!'. For all documents in the 'stays' list:
> >>   1) we aim to have wglc by Seoul
> >>   2) publication requests started on as many as possible
> >>
> >> We plan to meet in Seoul, but not in Chicago (Mar 2017) where we
> >> expect the ops group to exist and meet. We can progress documents in
> >> SIDR after Seoul, but the WG should close out shortly after the new
> >> year. (or that's the goal).
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >> -chris
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> sidr mailing list
> >> [e-mail]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr