[sidr] simulation study of RPKI deployment scenarios and its measured effect
Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Tue, 21 July 2015 15:21 UTC
Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEEF1B2F4A for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qvWcDs-tLhCP for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79C4E1B2F8B for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b283.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:743b:d330:54f2:2946]) by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AD9BEB7 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:20:25 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=none header.from=NLnetLabs.nl
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1437492025; bh=QD/Tfx3rzWNbRQAFD7SVJb/2QutDNosa0kdLAiGZaFc=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=VXhFG02sMIREkVnBvd9aKDhqdkNPDPr2O0PRf6Nqx9yCGasBoPwZkLYh4I7gAuFvm VRueayCTU4I1ViqVWjhzP4lWpZh2dW1qvncu2RRA1kC9+Jeu1aS48S8xKfFB4GpXD4 tze5aA1ytYL6yl8hddNEuuUs8HZoMTNexb8fr/M0=
To: sidr@ietf.org
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55AE6339.9080504@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:20:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/6QTaSIk-hyoCzn8o1tHIylam-YA>
Subject: [sidr] simulation study of RPKI deployment scenarios and its measured effect
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:21:30 -0000
Hi all, Not SIDR WG material, but interesting to the IETF people in the SIDR WG. Last month a student/intern at NLnet Labs finished his BSc. thesis on simulation of RPKI deployment scenarios and analysing the effect on routes (valid/invalid/unknown) and the length of the paths. Of course, this is just a study with a limited scope, focussed on a small number of specific scenarios. But maybe also a study to extend with more relevant scenarios, statistics measured, and results analysed. You can find the thesis and slides at: - thesis: https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/~benno/opendir/bryan-thesis-3.pdf - slides: https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/~benno/opendir/BGP%20Routing%20Security%20&%20Deployment%20Strategies-5.pdf If you are interested to discuss the study (comments/suggestions to improve, etc.), drop me an email and we can discuss the work during the next days at the IETF. Regards, -- Benno -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
- [sidr] simulation study of RPKI deployment scenar… Benno Overeinder