IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Injecting idea of "freshness of repository data" into BGP

Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Fri, 30 March 2012 08:54 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@arin.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3DA21F888B for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J6MPHs04WuK3 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.arin.net (smtp1.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CAC21F88A6 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id 49A37164F83; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:53:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH05.corp.arin.net (chaxch05.corp.arin.net [192.149.252.94]) by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B50164F80; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:53:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH03.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.17) by CHAXCH05.corp.arin.net (192.149.252.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:53:32 -0400
Received: from CHAXCH01.corp.arin.net ([169.254.1.210]) by CHAXCH03.corp.arin.net ([10.1.30.17]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:53:49 -0400
From: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] Injecting idea of "freshness of repository data" into BGP
Thread-Index: AQHNDLuXo/eCXWt5vUOntXvbJn/jApaAuMoAgABqOgCAAAf8AIAABw6AgAA5RICAAARuAIAAASoAgAAEwACAAB4ZAIABOxKA
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:53:49 +0000
Message-ID: <2C74399F-D505-4FF3-BD0D-57527E87784D@arin.net>
References: <20120328081939.GA19843@slice> <CA796250-4EA9-468D-BB4A-4C1187D2148F@tcb.net> <20120329072236.GA7311@slice> <61C7DEFD-B03F-42B2-B0FC-878E84C32629@ericsson.com> <20120329081625.GA9609@slice> <m262dnzlb0.wl%randy@psg.com> <20120329115714.GA18393@slice> <m21uobzkdn.wl%randy@psg.com> <20120329121824.GB18393@slice> <m2aa2zzelr.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2aa2zzelr.wl%randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.149.252.96]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <A426B7E7DBC9494AB72ECC38476FECA1@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Injecting idea of "freshness of repository data" into BGP
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:54:04 -0000

On Mar 29, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

>  o we could get much better rsync performance with a trivial change at
>    the rirs.

I've learned that little related to the RPKI is trivial.

Is the actual issue observed with rsync documented anywhere, along with a more descriptive solution? I think I understand what is being asked, but it would be best to have clarity before making changes.

Also, the presentation given at SIDR and IEPG indicated the study was done with only one RPKI validator. We have all three running in our lab and have noticed differences in speed over a local network with the same repository. Before declaring the problem a universal issue with rsync, wouldn't a test with the other validators provide helpful data points?

-andy

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status