IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Key learning procedures in BGPsec?

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Mon, 30 January 2012 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F3E21F8737 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:59:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f+Z0CU-ykmK1 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A206A21F8736 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp89-089-190.bbn.com ([128.89.89.190]:49203) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1RrzG0-000JE2-9I; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:59:24 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240810cb4cc0b0119f@[128.89.89.190]>
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCip4qD4ePPEng7uNVjz9ebO1U5A4oN_Dd5YneELxTUWrVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <13269421-8A36-4628-9F1A-30E02B922AE1@verisign.com> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F6074CA8@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <A0B7EE2D-8E59-4DC8-9DC0-140E9574B479@verisign.com> <p06240804cb3caa4fd051@128.89.89.66> <CCE15AEB-D606-4A59-8118-BA5CD53413E8@verisign.com> <p06240807cb3e3e117777@128.89.89.66> <12C07EA1-EDC5-4F88-99F7-B57B9AF53C53@verisign.com> <p06240801cb43712287ed@10.243.32.68> <79053E60-25FE-4A84-9391-F451C8F0E720@verisign.com> <p06240818cb477d54edae@128.89.89.66> <CAH1iCiq04z2k+q2xBFGmnoRyuHmrE44_8cdgjTN4JVg6YwJALw@mail.gmail.com> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F6077830@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CAH1iCip4qD4ePPEng7uNVjz9ebO1U5A4oN_Dd5YneELxTUWrVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:52:13 -0500
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>, "sidr@ietf.org list" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Key learning procedures in BGPsec?
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:59:28 -0000

At 2:57 PM -0500 1/30/12, Brian Dickson wrote:
>
>...
>
>There are other kinds of encryption as well, which involve shared
>keys, or in case of DH, random session keys with neither party
>having/needing the other's key material.

not true. DH key agreement requires that each party receive the public
key of the other, in order to compute a shared secret.

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email