IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-07

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Thu, 22 June 2017 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7B3129400; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 02:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x2zA8JiiFT3T; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 02:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 504BA128B51; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 02:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1474; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1498123501; x=1499333101; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=dUugbXki6qPmwTvL2vCOUDgO02/3YjpFR76RNi8u36s=; b=Q1VBb71QmjwuiEV5PIsmMwzMjaYV+l11vgYBYPIdW19zkE6zfuvRjey0 yWbWDgdQrxlVH6iK8aicYNtNZuElHFGYgqqXDaH8HrqdsiUUk2HM759Mt yNvkgfwdm2i2t/v4aLDAafr8ktoo/oa+1nAMRfNSFgDSLaALYP4dg9c7N 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ARAQCWjEtZ/5tdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1iBbweDZYoZkTwilXiCEYYkAhqCYj8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQEEASMRRQULAgEIGgImAgICMBUQAgQOBYokCKtigiaLZQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2BC4VigWArC4Juh30wgjEBBJcdh0YCk2CCCZAGiSWLcAEfOIEKdBVbAYR6HIFmdoceAgIiB4EFgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,372,1493683200"; d="scan'208";a="264674245"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jun 2017 09:24:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5M9OohT001401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:24:50 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 04:24:50 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 04:24:49 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
CC: "draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered@ietf.org>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-07
Thread-Index: AQHSmQVAKIoRRn/RNUKU0uFv8zRBd6GQn0+AgAE/doCAAMXagIAAPSwAgABKFgCAAtHPgICRFmCAgApy9ICAAC8TAA==
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:24:49 +0000
Message-ID: <5C70CE73-FEC7-4592-AF31-90B2664A9144@cisco.com>
References: <5821A5CF-EFF8-4CE3-9AA4-CFDB9C903D63@cisco.com> <20170311222527.324125ACF21@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <yj9ok27upcws.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <6359B4B1-478D-4017-B259-7B60BA55FF39@zdns.cn> <68C71545-48E4-40B8-91AC-88DE44C4125D@ripe.net> <yj9ozigpz299.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <8C26566E-8E22-4D35-85E1-387BA980115E@ripe.net> <C1D1FDD2-9892-4EE0-86FF-24F412AF6669@cisco.com> <DDA98C9A-F765-4922-A11B-52470A8AD2E1@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <DDA98C9A-F765-4922-A11B-52470A8AD2E1@ripe.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.208.170]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A48DCDF26D74E54D87A3CE341CA078A2@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/9Sz7RaGd5_3gIaVkzDpt-Ydcwxo>
Subject: Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-07
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:25:03 -0000

On 6/22/17, 10:36 AM, "Tim Bruijnzeels" <tim@ripe.net> wrote:

Tim:

Hi!

> All that said I will work on an update of this document following 
> Alvaro’s review. This document will define an additional validation 
> algorithm, but not update the existing one. We can finish this work 
> first and then have a structured discussion about deployment - I 
> propose that we take this work to SIDROPS.

I’m assuming that you mean: finish draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered in sidr (i.e. publish as an RFC) and then further discuss deployment in sidrops, right?

> I canceled all my meetings today so I should have updated text to 
> share with my co-authors soon. Will then send a new version to 
> the WG asap.

Just a procedure note:  Even though there should be a good number of changes, I don’t think we need to run the result through the WG (as in a new WGLC).  I’m happy to allow time for anyone to comment further, either now or during IETF LC.  I just rather not officially send the document back to the WG.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email