Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz

Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> Tue, 06 September 2016 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B46212B20E; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CaE8VtmI_9zQ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (relay.ops-netman.net [192.110.255.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1D3D12B213; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.ops-netman.net (mailserver.ops-netman.net [199.168.90.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00DB94089E; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:06:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from morrowc-glaptop4.roam.corp.google.com.ops-netman.net (unknown [104.132.12.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E01C24DE452A; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:06:47 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:06:47 -0400
Message-ID: <yj9o60q9ui5k.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
From: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <453bf466-2b47-966f-4378-19a161d0c6a1@bogus.com>
References: <yj9ooa46aumt.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <453bf466-2b47-966f-4378-19a161d0c6a1@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Organization: Operations Network Management, Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/9_TEFweDxogbOkg5S_-3kmUsOZQ>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, sidr-ads@ietf.org, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 16:10:00 -0000

At Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:06:25 -0700,
joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>; wrote:
> 
> [1 Re: Current document status && directionz <multipart/mixed (7bit)>]
> [1.1  <text/plain; windows-1252 (quoted-printable)>]
> On 9/2/16 1:56 PM, Chris Morrow wrote:
> > 
> > Howdy SIDR peeps,
> > (+bonus ops ad)
> > 
> > Following on the Berlin meeting we were trying to accomplish two
> > things:
> > 
> >   1) get all documents related to sidr protocols into wglc and then
> >   publication
> > 
> >   2) get all documents which are more operationally focused moved
> >   along to an ops group (sidr-ops or something akin to that)
> > 
> > With that in mind there are 8 documents in the publication queue:
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis
> > 
> > and 11 still in progress. Of the 11 left Sandy and I think they
> > roughly break down like:
> > 
> > Documents which should move to the ops group:
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light - authors notified/queried about this
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying
> 
> I think we good good feeback on the draft of a charter, I will start
> work on taking this to the IESG, but as some point soon the time will
> come to ask for community review of that proposal.
> 

I also forgot to mention the all-res draft: 
  draft-rir-rpki-allres-ta-app-statement

is waiting for some AD comments to complete (with chairs I mean) to set location/direction.