[sidr] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10: (with COMMENT)

["Kathleen Moriarty" <[e-mail]>]

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-publication/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for addressing the security directorate review.

As for Alissa's comment on transport, more language added to the Security
Considerations section would be helpful to explain why the CMS signature
is sufficient.  I am assuming that the only exposure would be to public
information during transport that is protected from tampering, unless I
missed something in reading the draft (I don't think you are transferring
private keys and didn't see that in the text).

Security controls being managed according to the CA policy mentioned
earlier in the document is appropriate, having run CAs before - there are
strict requirements already depending on the level you plan to run the
CA.