IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-08: (with DISCUSS)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 15 February 2017 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25643129861; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:20:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M5DDwbP3pKZY; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D8FB124281; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:20:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8218; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487193639; x=1488403239; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=OFaZ8XXQl7lGVJaPYjoa2kI8lLQ3r/OFLOr4ZO8LYrM=; b=V8c+9XcDwKURUoOT7C3flbFfTHs6zryiaSH6kLjOdQF/8Fhqo6L5ypUt HLaWxdK1nQ2QOv9rPI5WnToWBprpItqa1zExyOtlMrla7TPrtW1qq9KEq DJlwnMVr7kDDsIbHIkjsgfl3R/LNfl/FoAxLjuHahe49vP8k6OcxZUhEg s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DNAwBhxaRY/5tdJa1eGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgm9jRxqBCQeDUooIohpRgkyCD4IMhiICGoF6PxgBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRxBiNWEAIBCA4xAwICAjAUBgsCBAENBYlrsEWCJSuLCwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2GTYIFgmqHWi6CMQWVVYYiAZITgXuFF4l0kxYBHziBAFEVTgGEaYFIdYlFgQwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,166,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="180991269"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2017 21:20:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1FLKcSC026576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:20:38 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:20:37 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:20:37 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-08: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHSh6WJGdr5LSSJWEuaTdEK84VyJaFqpbqA///+cYA=
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:20:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CA62DA71-CE9F-484F-9D13-1996A0457D52@cisco.com>
References: <148717477752.17305.14232510120804304925.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170215162611.5C79447A4F05@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20170215162611.5C79447A4F05@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1e.0.170107
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.3]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CA62DA71CE9F484F9D131996A0457D52ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/BNVmfiegrwmT8E9t58jEhEsLmpo>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-08: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:20:44 -0000

Thanks Rob!


Yes, initially this document was marked to obsolete rfc6810, but at the same time it mandated the use of the previous version as part of the Protocol Version Negotiation.  Given that it may take a while before caches and routers both implement this new version, we decided to settle on leaving rfc6810 alone for now, and declaring it Historic/Obsolete later on.

Alvaro.

On 2/15/17, 11:26 AM, "Rob Austein" <sra@hactrn.net<mailto:sra@hactrn.net>> wrote:


Further there is an issue on how the versioning is done. This document
looks like a bis document and used to obsolete the old spec till the last
version (-07) but now neither updates nor obsolete it.

Correct.  Our AD told us that we could not both obsolete version zero
and specify how to fall back from version one to version zero.  Please
feel free to take this up with our AD.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email