Re: [sidr] replies needed quickly RE: possible additional meeting times

Given that there is not a lot of lead time before this, *and* that the IDR
meeting is immediate before this slot...
And that there is a moratorium on -00 IDs (meaning any material under
discussion is limited to already-submitted items)...

Discussing the reqs doc then is fine.
Perhaps the time slot adjacency to IDR might make for a good time to
consider the issues relating
to the material on route-leaks.

I suspect that trying to conduct the full proposed agenda, would not be
such a good idea. Too rushed, would do more harm than good.

I would respectfully suggest that having an agenda of interest to the IDR
folk, would actually be a good idea.

It is entirely possible that insufficient input from IDR participants is
leading to "group think", and that more diverse views would improve the WG
output.

I also suspect that attracting operator representation (who may be at IDR)
would be beneficial as well.

I think origin-ops, bgpsec-reqs, and bgpsec-ops would be a good slate.

I do not think it would be timely to have a review of bgpsec-protocol, just
yet, and in particular, might seem even more exclusionary to have this in
the secondary SIDR slot.

IMHO.

Brian

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Murphy, Sandra <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>wrote:

> One important point.
>
> The routing AD needs to know the decision by COB UTC time on Tuesday
> (tomorrow).
>
> So replies are needed quickly.
>
> --Sandy
>
> ________________________________________
> From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Murphy,
> Sandra [Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 5:37 PM
> To: sidr@ietf.org
> Subject: [sidr] possible additional meeting times
>
> The routing ADs have suggested that sidr could use the cancelled  EAI
> and/or
> the cancelled CODEC slot to make up for the cancelled virtual meeting.
>
> EAI was to meet 1300-1500 Afternoon Session I on Monday March 26.
> CODEC was to meet 1120-1220 Afternoon Session I Friday March 30.
>
> Please speak up as to whether either of these two spots would work.
>
> --Sandy
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>