IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] RPKI validator testing summary

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 03 December 2011 05:46 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5C521F8D12 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 21:46:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2+MKrsIGAynE for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 21:46:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621B921F8CFC for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 21:46:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1RWiQu-000LFS-7c; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 05:46:45 +0000
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 14:47:07 +0900
Message-ID: <m2liqu8aw4.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <1BADD28A-5808-48BB-A85D-275ED141D2D8@apnic.net>
References: <4ED64E04.7030408@bbn.com> <E3871AC3-6960-433A-8A34-7F10087A7EC7@apnic.net> <E03612FA-E271-4243-AE29-858D242B91CE@apnic.net> <m2r50m8gk2.wl%randy@psg.com> <1BADD28A-5808-48BB-A85D-275ED141D2D8@apnic.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: sidr wg <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] RPKI validator testing summary
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 05:46:49 -0000

>> so are you saying bottom up is just a no-go?
> I believe I am, in that by following the AIA pointers you may be lead
> to places that may not match your chosen trust anchors.
> This is particularly the case for those who want to set up local TAs
> as per some draft or another.

as at least one validation implementation, bbn, is bottom up, and was
done by clueful folk next to some draft or another, i suspect we need to
document this in a warning some place.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email