Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-signaling-09
Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> Wed, 30 November 2016 15:42 UTC
Return-Path: <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442851295D5 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:42:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id se2lMC7d3CbK for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:42:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net [IPv6:2606:700:e:550:5c82:28ff:fe25:4960]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78A4A1295C3 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:42:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.ops-netman.net (mailserver.ops-netman.net [199.168.90.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F47740A62; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:42:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from donkey.her.corp.google.com.ops-netman.net (unknown [104.132.12.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06113785FF4; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:42:13 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:42:12 -0500
Message-ID: <yj9ooa0xht4b.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
From: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m260n5hywb.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <88A45E79-880B-4F82-9FAA-80C05627A49F@cisco.com> <917E9000-8F1F-4E4F-BDEC-767E3510A71A@juniper.net> <yj9od1hdrah8.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <F173D66B-3A4F-4C96-BFE2-02D83D8EB17B@juniper.net> <yj9oa8chr6to.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <m260n5hywb.wl-randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Organization: Operations Network Management, Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/CxiBHjojIy1aUZIXzNpnxhK8Q64>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-signaling-09
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:42:21 -0000
At Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:37:24 -0800, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote: > > >>> and stitching back together the tcp session... same effect. > >> > >> Not sure why you have to stitch back together the TCP session? I > >> thought you were supposing the "attacker" was the edge node, it can > >> just apply an export policy towards the core. > > > > say the case is inside your network, between the edge node in NYC and > > the core nodes in BWI, something on the fiber path just removes/adds > > information to the bgp stream. > > < pedantry > > > the point is the tcp 'stream' does not have to be hacked in any way. > the hack is at a layer above. sure. but in the case where you own both sides you'd assume that the goes-inta == goes-outa on a single stream... ideally you also backstop that with some protections (tcp-ao, of course!), but... really.
- [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-signal… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… John G. Scudder
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… Chris Morrow
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… John G. Scudder
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… Chris Morrow
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… John G. Scudder
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… Chris Morrow
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… John G. Scudder
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [sidr] AD Review of sidr-origin-validation-si… Randy Bush