IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] BGPSec scaling (was RE: beacons and bgpsec)

"Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> Wed, 07 September 2011 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA8721F8B26 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nLVAjn+RXyp4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wsget1.nist.gov (wsget1.nist.gov [129.6.13.150]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E584F21F855D for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WSXGHUB2.xchange.nist.gov (129.6.18.19) by wsget1.nist.gov (129.6.13.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.0; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:51:35 -0400
Received: from MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov ([fe80::d479:3188:aec0:cb66]) by WSXGHUB2.xchange.nist.gov ([129.6.18.19]) with mapi; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:51:15 -0400
From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: "George, Wesley" <wesley.george@twcable.com>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:51:45 -0400
Thread-Topic: [sidr] BGPSec scaling (was RE: beacons and bgpsec)
Thread-Index: AcxXlRYzx19OWW9WR+qLPmTOJN+B3gAtymVABVV7wuA=
Message-ID: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49308D36D8383@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
References: <A37CADA4-F16D-4C01-8D9C-D01001C4EFE4@tcb.net> <21C19DA8-7BF3-4832-8C13-C9A45FE026FB@algebras.org> <87D9E106-2A37-4E1E-8C69-7084C199A3FE@tcb.net> <331AEFBD-6AE5-469E-A11E-E672DC61DCDC@pobox.com> <B92913D1-AB82-4D9F-B8A9-F8F4F99713D6@tcb.net> <p06240803ca685bff5443@[128.89.89.43]> <D6D12861-412E-4A65-B626-B627449981B8@tcb.net> <34E4F50CAFA10349A41E0756550084FB0C2ED5A4@PRVPEXVS04.corp.twcable.com>
In-Reply-To: <34E4F50CAFA10349A41E0756550084FB0C2ED5A4@PRVPEXVS04.corp.twcable.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [sidr] BGPSec scaling (was RE: beacons and bgpsec)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:50:01 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of George, Wesley
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 5:41 PM
> 
-- snip --
>
> As far as where this leaves BGPSec, I don't know. Perhaps a solution comes in the form of
> some of us starting to champion the necessary work to move one or more of the better ideas
> from RRG into implementation so that the underlying scaling problem is being addressed in
> parallel. It should be quite possible to incorporate improvements to route security into
> whatever must already be done to improve scale, and even if not, these are two things that
> both share a barrier to deployment, especially incrementally, and would certainly benefit
> from being designed  and deployed in concert instead of in separate silos.
> 
> Thanks
> Wes George

Wes,

Sorry for the belated response -- I was away in India on vacation :) 
We had some discussion earlier on this list about
BGPSEC in conjunction with an RRG scalability solution (e.g., LISP).
(You might have seen these posts back in May, but just in case.)

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg02836.html 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg02837.html 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg02847.html 

These posts relate only to the above noted comment from you
(but not directly to a different question you've raised 
w.r.t. the concerns in 4984/6227).  

Sriram

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email