IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 18 July 2011 05:05 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD4721F8B23 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 22:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nSWl9gU3PtoH for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 22:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1704021F8B29 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 22:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1Qig1W-000Adm-9F; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 05:05:42 +0000
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 22:05:41 -0700
Message-ID: <m2mxgcrxei.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06240802ca494b0cfe83@[198.18.176.250]>
References: <4E209AC9.5040808@cisco.com> <20110717145323.6460631BDB0@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <F3747D13-2885-4DBE-8B86-DAE1C61D75CA@apnic.net> <p06240802ca494b0cfe83@[198.18.176.250]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: Rob Austein <sra@isc.org>, draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct@tools.ietf.org, sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 05:05:57 -0000

> If youy want to compare the RPKI to the general PKI repository model 
> (X.500), note that in an X.500 directory, every object is tagged in a 
> fashion analogous to the filename extension. LDAP tags objects as 
> well. So why is it not appropriate to do so, in a normative fashion 
> here?

it is appropriate.  imiho, those should be MUSTs.

randy

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status